The Trial of Bradley Manning

As Seen By A Career Soldier

By Timothy Gatto
OpEdNews.com
July 27, 2013

After the details of My Lai, a Vietnamese village that was destroyed
and men, women and children killed by U.S. Soldiers came out, and
the military had selected their fall guy for the massacre, Lt. Calley,
we in the Army were subjected to constant classes on when to follow
or when not to follow orders.

We were told that there are legal orders and illegal orders, and
that following illegal orders, would be well...illegal.

If an enlisted man followed what he knew to be an illegal order, not
only would the person that gave the illegal order be held responsible,
the person that carried out the illegal order could also be charged.

It all sounds good, but it reality it is as the Brits say, "A bit of a
sticky wicket".

This is because in the military, they also teach you to follow orders
immediately, if there is a question about what orders to follow, bring
it up later.

In combat, when your life is on the line, and also the lives of
your comrades on the battlefield with you, the best thing is to
follow the orders even if it means putting your own life on the
line.

This is because the "fog of war" in the midst of battle is usually
better seen (but not always) by the command that has a better
picture of what is taking place.

We were given class after class as to what is an "illegal order".

Discussions were held, and looking back on it, the classes were really
a reaction to the media's portrayal of the military during and directly
after the My Lai trial, for public consumption, and to raise the morale
of the troops when many in the military were ashamed of atrocities
committed in Vietnam.

This was a way to let the public and the troops know that the
military was addressing some of the unspeakable horrors of
war and they were trying to do something about it.

In reality, this was a public relations operation.

The idea was that if a soldier saw something going on that was not
legal according to the Geneva Convention on the Laws of War, that
soldier should go to a higher authority and report it.

If he didn't have the time, he should refuse to participate and if it
was within his power, he should try to stop it.

This all sounds reasonable, but in the military, sometimes it is not
as cut and dry as one would think.

Now, in this day and age, we have a military that has seen continuous
combat operations for over a decade.

Most of the invasions and operations are, in reality, contrary to the
Geneva Conventions themselves.

This places the American soldier in a predicament from the start.

The question being that if one enlists and takes the oath of
enlistment to obey the orders of the officers above him and
to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies
foreign and domestic, when your nation is breaking both U.S.
and international law in the first place, how do you obey the
orders of those officers that give them?

Now we had situation where a Private First Class was allowed to
access sensitive information that showed beyond a reasonable
doubt that the American military was committing atrocities and
crimes that were against not only his moral code, but were
against military law and the Geneva Conventions.

This was during a period when the U.S. Military was committing
crime after crime by using depleted uranium (a weapon of mass
destruction), and destroying entire cities as in Fallujah with air
strikes, artillery and armor, killing men women and children
indiscriminately and for all intents and purposes, destroying the
city.

Meanwhile, no soldiers were reporting crimes to their superiors
(that we know about).

It was business as usual in this new type of hostilities against other
nations in undeclared wars that the U.S. euphemistically calls, "The
War on Terror".

Soldiers were seemingly following illegal orders on a daily basis
and "doing their duty".

This Private First Class was in a terrible quandary.

It must have seemed to him that with his access to all of this
sensitive information that allowed him to see a larger picture of
what was really going on, that his nation was indeed committing
grievous war crimes.

When he brought this matter to his superiors, he was ignored.

This, in reality, is what many soldiers experience when confronted
with war in all of its horrific forms.

The difference here is that this lowly Private decided that he was
going to expose these crimes.

Like I said, in this day and age, long after the My Lai massacre,
this type of behavior is unheard of.

According to the American Government, the enemy we face
is more horrific and dangerous than any we have ever faced.

After all, didn't Muslims fell the Twin Towers and kill innocent
Americans and aren't they plotting continuously to commit acts
of terror against the United States?

As far as the military was concerned, the gloves were off and
according to the President at the time; "Either you are with us
or against us".

It must have taken a supreme act if courage for Bradley Manning
to finally release his information to the only people that seemed
to care what was happening in Iraq, Wikileaks.

Now he finds himself in front of a Court Martial after being tortured
for months by the military by being forced to remain in solitary
confinement for months, while remaining naked, in a cold dark cell,
being treated like an animal in direct violation to all military law and
the Geneva Conventions in regard to treatment of prisoners.

Most of his defense has been deemed by the people in charge of his
Court Martial to be inadmissible, and this leaves him defenseless
against the power of the United States military that had once
proclaimed that if a soldier saw wrongdoing and violations of the
Geneva Convention on the Laws of War, that soldier should go to
a higher authority and report it, and if it was within his power, he
should try to stop it.

The Private did report it, but the report of these violations fell on
deaf ears.

Now he will pay the price of doing the right thing.

Doing the right thing, not only to assuage his own sense of right and
wrong, but doing the right thing according to what the United States
Army once told their soldiers.

This is a new age however.

An age of masking wars as defensive actions, even though they are
in reality invasions of other nations against all International Law, the
Geneva Conventions are no longer relevant.

We have seen an observer call on Apache attack helicopters to fire
on journalists walking with their cameras on a city street, and once
they were wounded and lying on the street and when people ran to
help them, the Apaches were ordered to fire on the rescuers.

Manning let the world see this. Still, no charges were filed against
the individuals responsible for these actions.

It is Bradley Manning that will suffer for these actions.

The American military is using this to issue a warning to their
soldiers that conscience and adherence to the laws of war will
no longer be tolerated.

This is what the trail of Private First Class Bradley Manning means.



Timothy Gatto is the former Chairman of the Liberal Party of
America and is he a retired Army Sergeant. Timothy is also the
author of Kimchee Days or Stoned Cold Warriors.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Trail-Of-Bradley-Manni-by-
Timothy-Gatto-130727-670.html