BREAKING NEWS

ISIS is Israeli Secret Intelligence Service

Thursday, September 15, 2011

The Meaning of Social Revolution

My Dear Fellow Global Citizens:

Below for your independent and thoughtful review, is a copy of an Address, that was delivered for the S. P. of C. in the Labor Temple, in Winnipeg, Canada on March 9, 1945, by J. Milne.

I now very respectfully ask what has really changed exactly 66 years,
6 months, and 6 days, later and as a Society, are we still in need of
a "Social Revolution" and are you ready to finally join the movement?

Sincerely,

Tony E. Whitcomb
Founder/CEO Expotera

The Meaning of Social Revolution

The word Revolution is a source of fear to a great many people. In their minds it brings forth a picture of civil strife, bloodshed and destruction.

It portrays the ruin of all the things they love and respect, and the setting up of conditions too horrible even to mention. It is a word that is not pleasantly received.

On the one hand, this attitude arises from a genuine consciousness of economic interests.

To the owners of capital, it is not disturbing that dictatorships
spread themselves across the earth, leaving economic and
intellectual wretchedness in their wake – so long as the interests
of capital are not affected thereby.

These activities, indeed, are even useful at times, since they give the proper people a firmer grip on the affairs of society by cleansing the minds and purging the ranks of workmen who have become misguided and discontented.

To the owners of capital it is not disturbing that bombs should drop
from the skies, that the work of man should be reduced to rubble,
and that men, women and children should be ground into that rubble
if these things happen in the interests of capital.

To the owners of capital it is fitting that insecurity and want should
be permanent features of a world of plenty, since these are the only
things upon which power and wealth can be built.

But Revolution! Intolerable!

On the other hand, this attitude towards Revolution arises from a
genuine lack of consciousness of economic interests. The workers
of the world do not understand wherein their interests lie.

They are under the influence of the perverted outlook of the ruling class; and because of this they accept the evils of modern society with tolerance, or resentment turned in the wrong directions, while they face the thought of Revolution with almost unanimous opposition.

We stand for Revolution.

But let it be made clear now that we mean by Revolution, not the
things they say we mean, not the tortured existence with which
you are now all so familiar, not a change of rulers, masters, or
government personnel: we mean a change that will put an end to
all these things, a basic change in the economic relationships of society.

We mean a Social Revolution – a Socialist Revolution.

Why do we speak of Revolution? There is a reason. What is it? Well, as a starting point, let us ask the question: “Is everyone satisfied with society as it is today?”

Even the most optimistic capitalist apologist would be compelled
to answer in the negative.

There can be no dispute about the fact that discontent is
widespread. It is not active, but it does exist.

Why are people discontented? Why are you discontented? Ask this question of yourself and of your workmates. Consider the answers.

In other parts of the earth, we should be obliged to head the list
with the terror brought by bombs and shells; the grief brought by
ruined homes; and the horror of living in the midst of death and destruction.

Here, we must head the list with the sorrow brought by little items: “Missing”, “Seriously wounded”, “Fallen in the line of duty”.

And following these comes the discontent arising from the many
restrictions and impositions brought by war, the shortages in
housing and in consumers’ goods, the rising price levels, etc.

It may be said that this discontent may be attributed mainly to the
war. That may be conceded, but was the war necessary? “Yes”,
perhaps you will answer, “It was necessary to destroy Hitler before
he destroys us”.

But that sort of thing was done once before, was it not? “No”, may come the reply, “but that was because we didn’t do a good enough job of it at that time. We shall not make the same mistake again.”

But let us suppose that a better job had been done last time. Would it have prevented the coming of Mussolini? Would it have prevented the rise of Japan? Would there never have been the Hungry Thirties?

And let us suppose that, after the war, Germany is completely exterminated. Will that prevent another Hitler from arising somewhere else – perhaps here?

Will that prevent another great depression, another great war?

These questions are occurring to workers. Only so far, at present, can they find answers that satisfy them.

The other questions remain unanswered, vaguely imprinted on their
minds, but looming ever greater as the months go by, bringing with
them the dawning thought that life can never be more than an
endless circle of want and viciousness, that their periods of greatest
access to the products of their own labors can come only at times
when millions of their kind are thrown at each other’s throats, only
at times of greatest tragedy.

A truly disturbing thought! Yet, where can there be found reason
for another thought?

Government plans for the post-war world (insofar as these concern the workers) are designedsolely to check actual starvation. How can such plans be reconciled with the thought of a world of plenty?

The “Big Three” conferences have already produced visible signs of disagreement, and if such signs are apparent in the midst of war, what hope can there be that the defeat of their present opponents will bring an end to such conflicts?

Peace and plenty may feature prominently in the words of capital,
but there is little room for them in the deeds of capital.

They talk of plenty and prepare for scarcity; they talk of peace
and prepare for war.

But even though the public figures of our time, the trusted and
honored statesmen of today, can and will do nothing to ease the
fears and difficulties of mankind, something can be done; and
our task is to show what can be done and how it is to be done.

This explanation will bring you closer to an understanding of
the meaning of Social Revolution.

There is one outstanding problem in modern society. It runs
constantly through all the changing fortunes of capitalism, ever
present, tending to become ever more intense with the passage
of time. And that is the problem of poverty.

If we trace back this problem to its breeding ground, we shall find
that these other problems which I have mentioned are related to it
in such a way that their solution can be effected only through the
solution of this fundamental problem.

The insecurity of trade depressions, the destructiveness of modern wars, the wretchedness of everyday life under capitalism can be ended only when poverty is ended.

You and I and the great mass of humanity, in order to live, are obliged to work for other people. We have no choice in the matter.

The mills, the mines, the factories, all the things that are needed
to sustain the life of all the people are owned by only a few of the
people – the capitalists.

This is a statement that hardly needs to be elaborated upon. It is common knowledge.

What is not common knowledge is the fact that here is to be found the source of the great evils of today.

The modern worker works in a plant which he does not own,
with machinery which he does not own; and the wealth which
he produces, he does not own.

What he receives in return is contained in an envelope, or is
represented by a check, and is called wages. And his wages
are a claim upon the wealth which he has produced.

Not all the wealth; only some of it.

He does not receive wealth proportionate to the amount which he produces. His wages rise at one time, and fall at another time; then rise and fall again at other times, depending largely upon the conditions of the labor market.

His productivity does not fluctuate like that.

And if we examine his real wage (i. e., the amount of goods he can obtain for his money wage) over an extended period of time, it will be seen that his standard of life has increased only in a trifling degree (in many cases not at all), and even this increase is of doubtful benefit in view of the greater insecurity of advancing capitalism.

Contrasted with the steady and tremendous advance in productivity, there can be room for doubt that the living standards of the workers come a sad-looking second.

Then what becomes of the ever-increasing wealth which the workers produce but do not receive? Into the coffers of capital it goes.

Part of it is used for the replacement and expansion of plant and machinery.

Part of it, of course, is used to surround the capitalist with massive evidences of wealth and luxury.

Part of it used to pay off the politicians, pedagogues, priests,
pressmen and such like for their services in keeping the minds
of the workers stunted.

But, between the factory and the coffers of capital, a devious
line is travelled by the wealth produced by labor.

Obviously, the articles produced in a given plant are not in
themselves of much use to the plant owner. The manufacturer
of shoes can wear only one pair of shoes.

It may suit his vanity to reserve for his personal use a dozen pair,
or even more; but clearly he cannot use the entire output of a shoe
factory. And that, of course, is not his purpose.

Neither is it his purpose to provide shoes to those who need shoes. His purpose is to realize profits.

So the shoes, which the workers have produced for him, are placed on the market, to be bought by those who need them and have the price to pay for them. And this, as everyone knows, is what happens to the entire out of modern industry.

The workers, as we have already pointed out, are not in a position
to buy back all their produce. Only part of it is within their means.

Nor can the capitalists themselves consume the balance. They are compelled, therefore, to reach ever farther afield in search of new outlets for their commodities.

But the markets thus created, although always expanding, do
not expand at a rate uniform with expanding productivity and
production, and every so often great masses of wealth pile up
and cause the capitalists to curtail production.

Then we have the spectacle of idle and hungry workers trudging the streets in search of work and begging the powers that be for crusts of bread in a land of plenty.

Such a condition existed during the Hungry Thirties. And the great
surpluses of wealth at that time were never fully disposed of until
the present war was well under way.

In the everyday production and circulation of wealth, the capitalists find themselves in need of sources of raw materials, protection in the transport of goods, new markets, etc. They fight amongst themselves over these things.

In a given country their differences are settled periodically at the ballot box.

On the international field, they frequently resort to violence, and
the workers are then called upon to join in the fight for freedom,
to save the world for democracy, to defend “our way of life” and
such-like nonsense.

Such is the true nature of this war.

This has been a brief sketch of the adventuresome and troublesome nature of commodity production. A great deal more could be said on the subject.

But perhaps enough has been said at this time to more than strongly suggest that wars are not the result of the wickedness of power-mad dictators, that depressions are not unfortunate natural phenomena, and that poverty is not the result of the failure of individuals to get ahead in the world.

Perhaps enough has been said to show that these evils are definitely related, that they are definite features of the economic fabric of society as at present constituted.

Perhaps enough has been said to show that they stem directly from the capitalist ownership of the means of life.

A lot of people around us think something ought to be done for the workers.

They think wages somehow out to be protected and even increased – reasonably, of course.

They think someone ought to take the workers under a protective wing during times of depression, that minimum standards ought to be set up, that boards of this and that ought to be formed, that the government ought to purchase some industries.

They think that if something (almost anything, it would seem) were done by a well-meaning government, it would prove beneficial to the downtrodden underdog.

These people (and occupying an honored position within their ranks
may be found the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation) forget,
or don’t know, that they are not pioneers in this kind of activity,
that they are simply the current representatives of a long line of
misinformed warriors who have been baying at the moon for generations.

Two great modern monuments provide adequate testimony to the success of their efforts: the Great Depression of the Hungry Thirties and the Great Catastrophe of the Bloody Forties.

Capitalism reminds one of the German worker back in the days
of secret rearmament in Germany. He worked in a factory that
produced parts for baby carriages.

His wife was to have a baby, so he naturally had to carry home the
necessary parts. He complained bitterly afterwards because, no
matter how he assembled the parts, the results was always the
same – a machine gun.

Capitalism is like that. No matter what you do to it, it reacts in the same way. Wrap yourself up in capitalism, sew up its rips and tears, call it by some other name, and it will still be a poor shelter from the wind.

The solution to the problem is Revolution – Social Revolution.

And by this we mean a new system of society, a system in which there will be neither private nor government ownership of the means for producing and distributing wealth, a system in which all these things will be owned in common by all the people, where wealth will be produced for no other purpose than to satisfy human needs.

We do not mean a condition of chaos, anarchy and bloodshed. We have these things now.

We mean a system in which peace, happiness and freedom for the mass of the people will have a real meaning for the first time in history.

We mean a system of society in which poverty, wars, insecurity
and all the evils existing and arising from the economic nature
of capitalism will be ended, once and for all time.

Is there any reason why such a state of affairs ought not to be introduced?

For thousands of years the slaves of society, with brains and
brawn and sweat and blood, have toiled to develop and erect
the magnificent structure that is the modern means for producing
the needs of mankind.

Who can stand up and state bluntly that only the capitalist class
may own these means and benefit from their operation?

Who can stand up and state bluntly that the workers of the world should continue to live in hovels and feed on swill and shower the greatness of their ever expanding abilities on the lap of a useless parasite class?

Is there any reason why the state of affairs which we propose
cannot be introduced?

The workers feed and clothe and fight for the capitalist class. They wait on them hand and foot and carry them around on their backs from the cradle to the grave.

When they decide that they will no longer engage in such
foolishness, what power on earth is great enough to prevent
them from asserting their will?

The day is coming when the workers of the world will rise from their knees, conscious of their own interests, their own strength, their own destiny.

The day is coming when the workers of the world will proceed about the task of building society anew.

How soon that day will come depends on how soon is built into an overwhelming force the movement striving for its attainment.

Today that movement is small, but its growth is the growth of the
working class will to power.

It is not a movement of banners and bunting, of fanfares and parades. Neither fireworks nor heroics feature its activities.

But it is the greatest movement ever undertaken by man.

And those who are its members are sure of their position, proud
of their position, and certain that every step they take is a step
forward. They know where they are going and they know how to
get there.

We invite you to join us. We offer you freedom from the mental enslavement of class society.

We offer you the companionship of men and women who are not
carried away by the sham, the hypocrisy, the lies of a decadent
ruling class.

Most of all, we offer you an opportunity to roll up your sleeves and take part in the activities of the one movement worth while – the movement for Social Revolution.

http://www.worldsocialism.org/canada/meaning.social.revolution
.htm

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.