Dear Deplorables
By Q
August 30, 2018
Dear Deplorables:
Sincerely,
To enlarge this image simply left click directly on the image 👌
Thursday, August 30, 2018
Tuesday, August 28, 2018
Trump Warns of Violence
Trump Warns of Violence
By Expotera
August 28, 2018
In a private meeting with Christian Evangelical Ministers and
Leaders, President Donald Trump warned of the potential of,
“Violence” if Republicans do not maintain control of Congress
in the upcoming, "Midterm Elections" according to an audio
recording of this meeting.
At a State Dinner last night at the White House, President Trump
urged this group of Religious Leaders to use the power of their
pulpits to make sure that, “all of your people vote" in November.
President Trump reportedly told them, “You’re one election away
from losing everything you’ve got."
If Republicans lose Congress, “they will end everything
immediately” the President said, seemingly referring to
Congressional Democrats.
President Trump went on to say the following:
“They will overturn everything that we’ve done and they’ll do
it quickly and violently. And violently. There’s violence. When
you look at Antifa, and you look at some of these groups, these
are violent people.”
Over the past two years, the American left and all Americans who
oppose President Trump incendiary rhetoric has been nothing short
of, “a whisper shy of a call for full civil war” as one Conservative
Commentator has already pointed out.
By acting like violent thugs who are willing to bully and terrorize,
"Law Abiding Citizens" black-clad anti-fascist protesters, and/or,
"Antifa” have shown up to protest and to demonstrate against,
"Conservative Speakers and Public Rallies" to make them afraid
to meet or to demonstrate in public.
The Author of, "The Coming Civil War In America" Dr. Michael Hill
President of the, 'League of the South" was directly quoted as
saying the following:
"With each passing day, we move closer to open conflict in America
– Civil War, if you will–between the forces of Western Civilization
(which is founded on a biblical understanding of nationalism) and
the forces of Judeo-Marxism or godless international leftism in
general. Both major U.S. political parties are being pulled in one
of these directions or the other. The elite, Jew-dominated media
have run interference for the left by pushing the anti-nationalist,
progressive Narrative non stop. The tension has been ratcheted so
high that something simply has to give. And it will."
So Inclosing, stay woke, stay safe, stay armed, and stay tuned.....
By Expotera
August 28, 2018
In a private meeting with Christian Evangelical Ministers and
Leaders, President Donald Trump warned of the potential of,
“Violence” if Republicans do not maintain control of Congress
in the upcoming, "Midterm Elections" according to an audio
recording of this meeting.
At a State Dinner last night at the White House, President Trump
urged this group of Religious Leaders to use the power of their
pulpits to make sure that, “all of your people vote" in November.
President Trump reportedly told them, “You’re one election away
from losing everything you’ve got."
If Republicans lose Congress, “they will end everything
immediately” the President said, seemingly referring to
Congressional Democrats.
President Trump went on to say the following:
“They will overturn everything that we’ve done and they’ll do
it quickly and violently. And violently. There’s violence. When
you look at Antifa, and you look at some of these groups, these
are violent people.”
Over the past two years, the American left and all Americans who
oppose President Trump incendiary rhetoric has been nothing short
of, “a whisper shy of a call for full civil war” as one Conservative
Commentator has already pointed out.
By acting like violent thugs who are willing to bully and terrorize,
"Law Abiding Citizens" black-clad anti-fascist protesters, and/or,
"Antifa” have shown up to protest and to demonstrate against,
"Conservative Speakers and Public Rallies" to make them afraid
to meet or to demonstrate in public.
The Author of, "The Coming Civil War In America" Dr. Michael Hill
President of the, 'League of the South" was directly quoted as
saying the following:
"With each passing day, we move closer to open conflict in America
– Civil War, if you will–between the forces of Western Civilization
(which is founded on a biblical understanding of nationalism) and
the forces of Judeo-Marxism or godless international leftism in
general. Both major U.S. political parties are being pulled in one
of these directions or the other. The elite, Jew-dominated media
have run interference for the left by pushing the anti-nationalist,
progressive Narrative non stop. The tension has been ratcheted so
high that something simply has to give. And it will."
So Inclosing, stay woke, stay safe, stay armed, and stay tuned.....
Friday, August 24, 2018
Tuesday, August 21, 2018
Lock Her Up
Lock Her Up
By Expotera
August 21, 2018
The United States of America is well over $21 trillion dollars in debt
yet, "Crooked Hillary Clinton" and all of her fellow, "War Criminals"
are all still walking freely among all of the rest of us.
Yet it seems that everyone who is connected to, "President Trump"
these days is currently under arrest, under investigation, being
convicted of a crime and/or taking some type of plea deal.
The United States of America is now officially at, "WAR" with itself,
and the United States of America is in the process of completely,
"DESTROYING" itself, and in the end, The United States of America
will have no one else to, "BLAME" but itself, for allowing someone
like, "Crooked Hillary Clinton" and all of her fellow, "War Criminals"
to continue to escape, "JUSTICE" in the era of President Donald J. Trump.
By Expotera
August 21, 2018
The United States of America is well over $21 trillion dollars in debt
yet, "Crooked Hillary Clinton" and all of her fellow, "War Criminals"
are all still walking freely among all of the rest of us.
Yet it seems that everyone who is connected to, "President Trump"
these days is currently under arrest, under investigation, being
convicted of a crime and/or taking some type of plea deal.
The United States of America is now officially at, "WAR" with itself,
and the United States of America is in the process of completely,
"DESTROYING" itself, and in the end, The United States of America
will have no one else to, "BLAME" but itself, for allowing someone
like, "Crooked Hillary Clinton" and all of her fellow, "War Criminals"
to continue to escape, "JUSTICE" in the era of President Donald J. Trump.
Sunday, August 19, 2018
Dear Trump Supporters
Dear Trump Supporters
By President Donald J. Trump
Sunday, August 19, 2018
Dear Trump Supporters:
Sincerely,
By President Donald J. Trump
Sunday, August 19, 2018
Dear Trump Supporters:
Sincerely,
Friday, August 17, 2018
Aretha Franklin
Aretha Franklin
By Expotera
August 17, 2018
Yesterday the world loss a true, "Living Legend" as well as the true,
"Queen of Soul" Aretha Franklin.
Aretha Franklin passed away yesterday at her home and in her
hometown of Detroit, Michigan surrounded by her closes Friends
and Family Members at the age of 76.
But before leaving all of us and before leaving this world,
"Aretha Franklin" left us with a very, very, special, "Gift"
that could have only come directly from, "God" Himself.
Over the course of her entire lifetime Aretha Franklin truly took
her, "Gift from God" and she shared this truly amazing, "Gift" with
as many of her fellow human beings as she possible could.
This is why the, "Queen of Soul" will never, ever, "Die" simply
because her, "Loving Memory" as well as her once in a lifetime,
"Body of Work" will now live on to the very end of time.
So Mrs. Franklin, may you now and forever rest in eternal love and
in eternal peace because you will always and forever have my and
our love, admiration, appreciation, and 110%, "R.E.S.P.E.C.T".....
By Expotera
August 17, 2018
Yesterday the world loss a true, "Living Legend" as well as the true,
"Queen of Soul" Aretha Franklin.
Aretha Franklin passed away yesterday at her home and in her
hometown of Detroit, Michigan surrounded by her closes Friends
and Family Members at the age of 76.
But before leaving all of us and before leaving this world,
"Aretha Franklin" left us with a very, very, special, "Gift"
that could have only come directly from, "God" Himself.
Over the course of her entire lifetime Aretha Franklin truly took
her, "Gift from God" and she shared this truly amazing, "Gift" with
as many of her fellow human beings as she possible could.
This is why the, "Queen of Soul" will never, ever, "Die" simply
because her, "Loving Memory" as well as her once in a lifetime,
"Body of Work" will now live on to the very end of time.
So Mrs. Franklin, may you now and forever rest in eternal love and
in eternal peace because you will always and forever have my and
our love, admiration, appreciation, and 110%, "R.E.S.P.E.C.T".....
Thursday, August 16, 2018
John Brennan
John Brennan
By Expotera
August 16, 2018
Yesterday President Donald Trump officially revoked the security
clearance of former CIA director, "John Brennan" saying he has
helped to, “Sow Division and Chaos” while continually criticizing
President Trump and his Administration.
President Trump and his Administration is also looking into revoking
the clearances of a number of these very, "Treasonous Criminals"
including former fired FBI director James Comey as well as most
recently fired FBI agent Peter Strzok, White House Press Secretary
Sarah Sanders told reporters on Wednesday.
“John Brennan has a history that calls into question his objectivity
and credibility,” White House press secretary Sanders said, quoting
a statement from Trump, adding that his conduct, “facilitates the
very aims of our adversaries, which is to sow division and chaos.”
A little over a week ago Senator Rand Paul, "Tweeted" the following
below in regards to, "John Brennan" and the revoking of his security
clearance as well, so it was very nice to see President Trump finally
follow through on all of this simply because and in the final words
of Senator Rand Paul, "John Brennan is Completely Unhinged".....
By Expotera
August 16, 2018
Yesterday President Donald Trump officially revoked the security
clearance of former CIA director, "John Brennan" saying he has
helped to, “Sow Division and Chaos” while continually criticizing
President Trump and his Administration.
President Trump and his Administration is also looking into revoking
the clearances of a number of these very, "Treasonous Criminals"
including former fired FBI director James Comey as well as most
recently fired FBI agent Peter Strzok, White House Press Secretary
Sarah Sanders told reporters on Wednesday.
“John Brennan has a history that calls into question his objectivity
and credibility,” White House press secretary Sanders said, quoting
a statement from Trump, adding that his conduct, “facilitates the
very aims of our adversaries, which is to sow division and chaos.”
A little over a week ago Senator Rand Paul, "Tweeted" the following
below in regards to, "John Brennan" and the revoking of his security
clearance as well, so it was very nice to see President Trump finally
follow through on all of this simply because and in the final words
of Senator Rand Paul, "John Brennan is Completely Unhinged".....
Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Totally IRussianal
Totally IRussianal
By Paul Edwards
Information Clearing House
August 14, 2018
Enough with accusations. Let’s assume the worst. Or maybe you
think of it as the best.
Let’s stipulate that Trump, never mind how, is the helpless tool
of evil Putin.
Putin posted social media attack rants to sow confusion and
doubt in American minds about their country, and ordered the
DNC hacking to expose and discredit Hillary on Wikileaks and
get his puppet elected.
What follows?
What was his grand purpose, the endgame?
So, as President, Trump was Putin’s abject slave.
What did Putin want?
Diplomatic relations.
Trump expelled a hundred Russian diplomats.
He demanded sanctions against Russia be dropped.
Trump added more.
He ordered Trump to stay in the Iran deal.
Trump dumped it.
He directed Trump to de-fund Kiev’s neo-Nazi regime and drop
demands to give up Crimea.
Trump said no.
He told Trump to cut the military budget.
Trump increased it.
He insisted Trump get out of Syria.
Trump refused and had to be forced out.
At Helsinki, he may even have asked Trump for--gasp!--a nuclear
arms control deal.
Trump demurred.
No go, Vlad, said the slave.
One would have to say that, to date, Putin’s having Trump by
the plums has produced no great triumphs.
How can that be?
What slavery is this?
Either you have leverage or you don’t; you can exert pressure
or you can’t.
Ah, but one bonehead military braintruster has revealed that it’s
all about undermining America’s “moral authority” in the world.
That, you see, is Putin’s truly diabolical desire.
Never mind all the oppositional policies and antagonistic acts by
Trump; they are but clever cover for a far more sinister plot by the
fiend Putin to diminish our cherished respect in the world mind.
One might have thought our grotesquely vicious blood-and-horror
shows in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria would have sufficed to
render our “moral authority” moot for Putin since we no longer
have any, but not so.
There is evidently no limit to his malevolent passion to see America
become the most hated nation on earth, and he wants it done--the
gods know how!--faster than we’re doing it ourselves.
That being so, one might suspect his evil meddling reaches far back
to Clilnton, the Bushes, and Obama, but that’ s not how the story
goes.
What Putin wants Trump to do is to eliminate non-existent
admiration and respect, a tough order indeed.
For the sake of rigorous inquiry, let’s set aside the poor
performance Putin is getting despite his death grip on his
victim, and speculate about what Vlad Teufelsdreck might
ideally hope for with a slave who honored his obligations
better.
If you’ve followed me so far, his goal seems clear.
He wants to recreate a Russian Empire and rule the world.
This may not be obvious from his actual behavior but we
need not be fooled by mere evidence.
After subverting, disarming and occupying the U.S.--having asked
Xi and China to hang tight while he conquers his moral authority-
impaired foes--he will then turn on China, just as Hitler did on....
Can you go on with this line of bullshit?
Can anyone?
Taking an honest look at the wild goat’s nest of irrationality
and deceit behind the claim that Putin has any hold of any
kind whatever on Trump, and then parsing the implications
of that idea, the infantile fatuity, the mind-numbing idiocy
of the whole sham has to slam one like a hi-balling train.
An assertion of fact is, in logic, a premise, which is a proposition
supporting a conclusion.
The assertion that Trump is Putin’s puppet supports the conclusion
that Trump must obey his will, which, QED, is howlingly absurd.
Clintonista Corporate Democrats, obdurate in hara-kiri mode,
have gone all in to attack Trump with this baseless fantasy rather
than blister him for the glaring evils he has actually perpetratred.
That would be damned awkward for them as many of their big
donors are just fine with the looney fiats of the Imperial Pagliacco.
And, their ploy has failed.
Trump’s riding them out.
They’ve embraced the Goldwater mantra, “Better Dead Than Red”
and are stoking the fires of the gullible for a face-off with Russia.
Gearing up for that Big One would be a jackpot for the
War Machine.
It could gouge out a far fatter hunk of budget than they’ve gotten
beating up defenseless little nations and it’d be fat city right up to
the point where Russia, generations ahead of Aunt Sam in weaponry
tore The Empire a great big new one.
If this desperate madness persists, we may yet have both Trump
and war.
It may be as Kafka reflected:
“There is infinite hope... but not for us.”
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50038.htm
By Paul Edwards
Information Clearing House
August 14, 2018
Enough with accusations. Let’s assume the worst. Or maybe you
think of it as the best.
Let’s stipulate that Trump, never mind how, is the helpless tool
of evil Putin.
Putin posted social media attack rants to sow confusion and
doubt in American minds about their country, and ordered the
DNC hacking to expose and discredit Hillary on Wikileaks and
get his puppet elected.
What follows?
What was his grand purpose, the endgame?
So, as President, Trump was Putin’s abject slave.
What did Putin want?
Diplomatic relations.
Trump expelled a hundred Russian diplomats.
He demanded sanctions against Russia be dropped.
Trump added more.
He ordered Trump to stay in the Iran deal.
Trump dumped it.
He directed Trump to de-fund Kiev’s neo-Nazi regime and drop
demands to give up Crimea.
Trump said no.
He told Trump to cut the military budget.
Trump increased it.
He insisted Trump get out of Syria.
Trump refused and had to be forced out.
At Helsinki, he may even have asked Trump for--gasp!--a nuclear
arms control deal.
Trump demurred.
No go, Vlad, said the slave.
One would have to say that, to date, Putin’s having Trump by
the plums has produced no great triumphs.
How can that be?
What slavery is this?
Either you have leverage or you don’t; you can exert pressure
or you can’t.
Ah, but one bonehead military braintruster has revealed that it’s
all about undermining America’s “moral authority” in the world.
That, you see, is Putin’s truly diabolical desire.
Never mind all the oppositional policies and antagonistic acts by
Trump; they are but clever cover for a far more sinister plot by the
fiend Putin to diminish our cherished respect in the world mind.
One might have thought our grotesquely vicious blood-and-horror
shows in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria would have sufficed to
render our “moral authority” moot for Putin since we no longer
have any, but not so.
There is evidently no limit to his malevolent passion to see America
become the most hated nation on earth, and he wants it done--the
gods know how!--faster than we’re doing it ourselves.
That being so, one might suspect his evil meddling reaches far back
to Clilnton, the Bushes, and Obama, but that’ s not how the story
goes.
What Putin wants Trump to do is to eliminate non-existent
admiration and respect, a tough order indeed.
For the sake of rigorous inquiry, let’s set aside the poor
performance Putin is getting despite his death grip on his
victim, and speculate about what Vlad Teufelsdreck might
ideally hope for with a slave who honored his obligations
better.
If you’ve followed me so far, his goal seems clear.
He wants to recreate a Russian Empire and rule the world.
This may not be obvious from his actual behavior but we
need not be fooled by mere evidence.
After subverting, disarming and occupying the U.S.--having asked
Xi and China to hang tight while he conquers his moral authority-
impaired foes--he will then turn on China, just as Hitler did on....
Can you go on with this line of bullshit?
Can anyone?
Taking an honest look at the wild goat’s nest of irrationality
and deceit behind the claim that Putin has any hold of any
kind whatever on Trump, and then parsing the implications
of that idea, the infantile fatuity, the mind-numbing idiocy
of the whole sham has to slam one like a hi-balling train.
An assertion of fact is, in logic, a premise, which is a proposition
supporting a conclusion.
The assertion that Trump is Putin’s puppet supports the conclusion
that Trump must obey his will, which, QED, is howlingly absurd.
Clintonista Corporate Democrats, obdurate in hara-kiri mode,
have gone all in to attack Trump with this baseless fantasy rather
than blister him for the glaring evils he has actually perpetratred.
That would be damned awkward for them as many of their big
donors are just fine with the looney fiats of the Imperial Pagliacco.
And, their ploy has failed.
Trump’s riding them out.
They’ve embraced the Goldwater mantra, “Better Dead Than Red”
and are stoking the fires of the gullible for a face-off with Russia.
Gearing up for that Big One would be a jackpot for the
War Machine.
It could gouge out a far fatter hunk of budget than they’ve gotten
beating up defenseless little nations and it’d be fat city right up to
the point where Russia, generations ahead of Aunt Sam in weaponry
tore The Empire a great big new one.
If this desperate madness persists, we may yet have both Trump
and war.
It may be as Kafka reflected:
“There is infinite hope... but not for us.”
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50038.htm
Friday, August 10, 2018
Banning Alex Jones and Infowars
Banning Alex Jones and Infowars
By Binoy Kampmark
Dissident Voice
August 10, 2018
He is treated as the bogeyman of conspiracy entertainment, and
Alex Jones has become a prominent figure for advancing a host of
unsavoury views.
High on his list of incendiaries is the claim that the 2012 Sandy
Hook Elementary shooting never took place and was the work
of paid fantasists, with the victims’ parents being “crisis actors”.
“Sandy Hook,” went Jones in a January 2015 broadcast,
“is a synthetic, completely fake, with actors, in my view,
manufactured.” The parents of two children killed at the
school massacre are suing.
There are seemingly few limits to the Jones armoury of hyper-
scepticism.
But Jones has been in the business of such production for years.
Now, a campaign for banishing him from various platforms,
including Infowars, has been enacted with a degree of censorious
ferocity.
Summary bans have been made, ranging from the giants such
as Apple, Twitter, and Spotify, to Pinterest, and MailChimp.
Apple took the lead in this competitive banning binge, removing
five of the six Infowars podcasts available via iTunes this week,
including “The Alex Jones Show” and “War Room”, while Facebook
removed four Infowars pages for violating the company’s guidelines.
An Apple spokesperson explained the company’s position in a
statement:
“Apple does not tolerate hate speech, and we have clear guidelines
that creators and developers must follow to ensure we provide a
safe environment for all our users.” Accordingly, “Podcasts that
violate these guidelines are removed from our directory making
them no longer searchable or available for download or streaming.
We believe in representing a wide range of views, so long as people
are respectful to those with differing opinions.”
Spotify has also added its name to the list.
“We take reports of hate content seriously,” went a statement,
“and review any podcast episode or song that is flagged by our
community. Due to repeated violations of Spotify’s prohibited
content policies, The Alex Jones Show has lost access to the
Spotify platform.”
Who is guarding whom, and who should decide which ideas
are significantly safe, less discomforting or otherwise?
Contraries are, by definition, discomforting; the contrarian,
by definition, dangerously disruptive.
The idea of social media platforms becoming a constabulary for the
controlling of opinion – located in the vague economy of “hate” – is
ominous.
Nor have these technology mammoths articulated “a clear
standard,” as Ben Shapiro notes, “by which the conspiracy
theorist should be banned”.
Twitter prefers a different approach.
“We didn’t suspend Alex Jones or Infowars yesterday,” came
Jack Dorsey’s announcement on the medium he helped found.
“We know it’s hard for many but the reason is simple: he hasn’t
violated our rules. We’ll enforce if he does.”
For Dorsey, the role of policing Jones is not for Twitter and such
platforms, but the media proper, an estate that has been somewhat
remiss in recent years.
He did not want to take “one-off actions to make us feel good
in the short term, and adding fuel to new conspiracy theories.”
This in, and of, itself sensible view has drawn the predictable
moralising and indignation.
Aja Romano of Vox is particularly riled.
“This response is breathtakingly amoral, as well as regressive,
terrible decision-making – for Twitter, for the internet, for all
of us. It should be a moment of reckoning for everyone who uses
Twitter.”
Words do move and change worlds, and care should, at select
times, be taken, but who polices their dissemination and exchange
remains key.
Dorsey has simply diagnosed an inherent problem in the information
ecosystem about rage and counter-rage: who controls the
participants, bars or muzzles the competition, should not,
by default, fall to the giants.
For the market place of ideas to function with a fair degree
of effect, it is participants who dictate their value, oiled by
intermittent legal interventions to test the limits of free speech.
Free speech scholars have been skeptical about whether
Jones can avail himself of the First Amendment protections.
“False speech,” goes a submission by four jurists in an amicus brief
in the Brennan Gilmore case, “does not serve the public interest
the way that true speech does.”
Gilmore, a Democratic Party activist and former State Department
official was in Charlottesville on August 12, 2017 attending a violent
rally that subsequently saw the death of Heather Heyer, killed by a
car driven by James Alex Fields, Jr.
Furthermore, the jurists insist that “there is no constitutional
value in false statements of fact.”
Jones, for his part, has submitted in court papers that his
rubbishing of Gilmore (a CIA plant hired to foment disorder,
he suggested) were opinions, rather than statements of fact
while Infowars was a “freewheeling” website where “hyperbole
and diatribe reign as the preferred tools of discourse.”
The other issue in such summary bans is how they are challenged.
Tech platforms acting as righteous disciplinarians seems an odd
thing, appropriating a degree of power they simply should not
have.
And foolishly, the campaign against Jones has given him a sense
of dangerous frisson.
His information and views will not necessarily disappear so much
as migrate to other forums and mutate with aggression.
The conspiracy theorist will ride again, even as the various tech
giants bask in the ethical afterglow spurred on by anger and
undefined standards of hate.
https://dissidentvoice.org/2018/08/banning-alex-jones-and-
infowars
By Binoy Kampmark
Dissident Voice
August 10, 2018
He is treated as the bogeyman of conspiracy entertainment, and
Alex Jones has become a prominent figure for advancing a host of
unsavoury views.
High on his list of incendiaries is the claim that the 2012 Sandy
Hook Elementary shooting never took place and was the work
of paid fantasists, with the victims’ parents being “crisis actors”.
“Sandy Hook,” went Jones in a January 2015 broadcast,
“is a synthetic, completely fake, with actors, in my view,
manufactured.” The parents of two children killed at the
school massacre are suing.
There are seemingly few limits to the Jones armoury of hyper-
scepticism.
But Jones has been in the business of such production for years.
Now, a campaign for banishing him from various platforms,
including Infowars, has been enacted with a degree of censorious
ferocity.
Summary bans have been made, ranging from the giants such
as Apple, Twitter, and Spotify, to Pinterest, and MailChimp.
Apple took the lead in this competitive banning binge, removing
five of the six Infowars podcasts available via iTunes this week,
including “The Alex Jones Show” and “War Room”, while Facebook
removed four Infowars pages for violating the company’s guidelines.
An Apple spokesperson explained the company’s position in a
statement:
“Apple does not tolerate hate speech, and we have clear guidelines
that creators and developers must follow to ensure we provide a
safe environment for all our users.” Accordingly, “Podcasts that
violate these guidelines are removed from our directory making
them no longer searchable or available for download or streaming.
We believe in representing a wide range of views, so long as people
are respectful to those with differing opinions.”
Spotify has also added its name to the list.
“We take reports of hate content seriously,” went a statement,
“and review any podcast episode or song that is flagged by our
community. Due to repeated violations of Spotify’s prohibited
content policies, The Alex Jones Show has lost access to the
Spotify platform.”
Who is guarding whom, and who should decide which ideas
are significantly safe, less discomforting or otherwise?
Contraries are, by definition, discomforting; the contrarian,
by definition, dangerously disruptive.
The idea of social media platforms becoming a constabulary for the
controlling of opinion – located in the vague economy of “hate” – is
ominous.
Nor have these technology mammoths articulated “a clear
standard,” as Ben Shapiro notes, “by which the conspiracy
theorist should be banned”.
Twitter prefers a different approach.
“We didn’t suspend Alex Jones or Infowars yesterday,” came
Jack Dorsey’s announcement on the medium he helped found.
“We know it’s hard for many but the reason is simple: he hasn’t
violated our rules. We’ll enforce if he does.”
For Dorsey, the role of policing Jones is not for Twitter and such
platforms, but the media proper, an estate that has been somewhat
remiss in recent years.
He did not want to take “one-off actions to make us feel good
in the short term, and adding fuel to new conspiracy theories.”
This in, and of, itself sensible view has drawn the predictable
moralising and indignation.
Aja Romano of Vox is particularly riled.
“This response is breathtakingly amoral, as well as regressive,
terrible decision-making – for Twitter, for the internet, for all
of us. It should be a moment of reckoning for everyone who uses
Twitter.”
Words do move and change worlds, and care should, at select
times, be taken, but who polices their dissemination and exchange
remains key.
Dorsey has simply diagnosed an inherent problem in the information
ecosystem about rage and counter-rage: who controls the
participants, bars or muzzles the competition, should not,
by default, fall to the giants.
For the market place of ideas to function with a fair degree
of effect, it is participants who dictate their value, oiled by
intermittent legal interventions to test the limits of free speech.
Free speech scholars have been skeptical about whether
Jones can avail himself of the First Amendment protections.
“False speech,” goes a submission by four jurists in an amicus brief
in the Brennan Gilmore case, “does not serve the public interest
the way that true speech does.”
Gilmore, a Democratic Party activist and former State Department
official was in Charlottesville on August 12, 2017 attending a violent
rally that subsequently saw the death of Heather Heyer, killed by a
car driven by James Alex Fields, Jr.
Furthermore, the jurists insist that “there is no constitutional
value in false statements of fact.”
Jones, for his part, has submitted in court papers that his
rubbishing of Gilmore (a CIA plant hired to foment disorder,
he suggested) were opinions, rather than statements of fact
while Infowars was a “freewheeling” website where “hyperbole
and diatribe reign as the preferred tools of discourse.”
The other issue in such summary bans is how they are challenged.
Tech platforms acting as righteous disciplinarians seems an odd
thing, appropriating a degree of power they simply should not
have.
And foolishly, the campaign against Jones has given him a sense
of dangerous frisson.
His information and views will not necessarily disappear so much
as migrate to other forums and mutate with aggression.
The conspiracy theorist will ride again, even as the various tech
giants bask in the ethical afterglow spurred on by anger and
undefined standards of hate.
https://dissidentvoice.org/2018/08/banning-alex-jones-and-
infowars
Tuesday, August 7, 2018
The Lincoln–Kennedy Coincidences
The Lincoln–Kennedy Coincidences
By Expotera
August 7, 2018
Abraham Lincoln was the 16th President of the United States
of America until his, "Assassination" on April 14, 1865.
John F. Kennedy was the 35th President of the United States
of America until his, "Assassination" on November 22, 1963.
A year after President Kennedy's assassination in November of
1963 a, "List of Coincidences" first appeared in the, "G.O.P.
Congressional Committee Newsletter" then in the mainstream
American press between President Lincoln and President Kennedy's
individual lives, and their individual, "Assassinations" as well.
Below for your independent, objective and thoughtful review is a
copy of this, "List of Coincidences" which was first published back
in 1964, but still to this very day is truly a very fascinating thing to
read and to look back on as the United States of America as we all
now know it to be continues to head down, "The Rabbit Hole" here
in 2018:
Both presidents were elected to the House of Representatives
in '46.
Both presidents were non-masons and both of their successors
were masons (non-mason presidents replaced with mason power).
Both were losing candidates for their party's vice-presidential
nomination in '56.
Both presidents were elected to the presidency in '60.
Both died after being shot in the head
Lincoln defeated incumbent Vice President John C. Breckinridge
for the presidency in 1860.
Kennedy defeated incumbent Vice President Richard M. Nixon
for the presidency in 1960.
Both their predecessors were the last presidents to be born in
their respective centuries.
Both their predecessors left office in their seventies and retired
to Pennsylvania.
James Buchanan, whom Lincoln succeeded,
retired to Lancaster Township.
Dwight D. Eisenhower, whom Kennedy succeeded,
retired to Gettysburg.
They both then died before the end of the decade.
Both their Vice Presidents and successors were Southern Democrats
named Johnson (Andrew Johnson and Lyndon B. Johnson) who were
born in '08.
Both presidents were concerned with issues affecting
Black Americans and made their views strongly known
in '63.
Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation in 1862,
which took effect in 1863.
In 1963, Kennedy presented his reports to Congress on issues
related to the Civil Rights Movement, and in June of that year
delivered his Civil Rights Address on radio and television in
which he proposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Both presidents, and their successors, conferred with a nationally
known black leader about civil rights.
Both Lincoln and Andrew Johnson conferred with
Frederick Douglass.
Both Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson conferred with
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Both presidents were known for their wit and eloquence, and both
frequently quoted Shakespeare and the Bible in their speeches.
Both presidents had been captains of ships in their private lives:
Lincoln on a river boat, and Kennedy on PT-109.
Each president suffered from a genetic disease.
Lincoln had Marfan's syndrome.
Kennedy had Addison's disease.
Both presidents were shot in the head on a Friday seated beside
their wives.
Both Fridays preceded a major holiday observed within the week.
During the assassination, they were sitting in an alphabetical
pattern.
Their spouses first name and both president's last name.
J,K,L,M- Jackie, Kennedy, Lincoln, Mary.
Jackie was seated to the left of Kennedy and Mary to
the right of Lincoln.
Both presidents were accompanied by another couple.
The male companion of the other couple was wounded
by the assassin.
Both presidents fathered four children, and had a son
die during his presidency.
Both presidents had only one child survive into the next century.
That child served another president by political appointment.
Both presidents' wives died in their sixties after an untimely decline
in health, during the administration of a president who had seen
their husbands in Washington, D.C. the same year as the
assassination (Mary Todd Lincoln died during the presidency of
Chester A. Arthur. Arthur had attended President Lincoln's 1865
inauguration.
Jacqueline Kennedy died during the presidency of Bill Clinton.
Clinton met President Kennedy in 1963 during a Boys State
summer program).
Lincoln was shot by John Wilkes Booth at Ford's Theatre.
Kennedy was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald in a Lincoln automobile,
made by Ford.
Both presidents' last names have 7 letters.
Both assassins' full names have 15 letters.
Each assassin committed his crime in the building where he
was employed.
Both presidents were purportedly smiling immediately before
the assassination began.
After shooting Lincoln, Booth ran from a theatre to a warehouse;
after shooting Kennedy, Oswald ran from a warehouse to a theatre.
Both assassins died in the same month as their victim in a state
adjacent to the state of their birth.
Both assassins were Southern white males born in the late '30s, who
were in their mid-20s, and were 5'8" in height with hazel eyes and
brown hair.
Both assassins were sympathetic to a government that opposed the
United States, and both had once resided within that government's
borders.
Both assassins were killed before being tried, by men who were
reared in the North, changed their name as adults, and were
bachelors.
Both assassins suffered injuries during escape.
Both assassins fled using modes of transportation they did not own.
Booth rented a horse, Oswald rode a bus.
Both presidents had body guards named William, William H. Crook
told Lincoln not to go to the assassination point, William Greer
drove JFK to the assassination point.
Both bodyguards named William died within 48 hours of being aged
75 years, 5 months.
Presidential security was heavily criticized,
after each assassination, for being too lax.
Lincoln sat in box number 7 at Ford's Theater.
Kennedy sat in car number 7 in the motorcade.
The doctors who primarily attended to each president were both
named Charles.
Dr. Charles Leale treated Lincoln.
Dr. Charles Crenshaw treated Kennedy.
Each president died in a place with the initials "P.H." Lincoln died
at the Petersen House and Kennedy died at Parkland Hospital.
Kennedy was the second president in U.S. history who issued
interest-free money.
The first was Lincoln, who issued greenbacks to finance the war
between the states in the American Civil War.
By Expotera
August 7, 2018
Abraham Lincoln was the 16th President of the United States
of America until his, "Assassination" on April 14, 1865.
John F. Kennedy was the 35th President of the United States
of America until his, "Assassination" on November 22, 1963.
A year after President Kennedy's assassination in November of
1963 a, "List of Coincidences" first appeared in the, "G.O.P.
Congressional Committee Newsletter" then in the mainstream
American press between President Lincoln and President Kennedy's
individual lives, and their individual, "Assassinations" as well.
Below for your independent, objective and thoughtful review is a
copy of this, "List of Coincidences" which was first published back
in 1964, but still to this very day is truly a very fascinating thing to
read and to look back on as the United States of America as we all
now know it to be continues to head down, "The Rabbit Hole" here
in 2018:
Both presidents were elected to the House of Representatives
in '46.
Both presidents were non-masons and both of their successors
were masons (non-mason presidents replaced with mason power).
Both were losing candidates for their party's vice-presidential
nomination in '56.
Both presidents were elected to the presidency in '60.
Both died after being shot in the head
Lincoln defeated incumbent Vice President John C. Breckinridge
for the presidency in 1860.
Kennedy defeated incumbent Vice President Richard M. Nixon
for the presidency in 1960.
Both their predecessors were the last presidents to be born in
their respective centuries.
Both their predecessors left office in their seventies and retired
to Pennsylvania.
James Buchanan, whom Lincoln succeeded,
retired to Lancaster Township.
Dwight D. Eisenhower, whom Kennedy succeeded,
retired to Gettysburg.
They both then died before the end of the decade.
Both their Vice Presidents and successors were Southern Democrats
named Johnson (Andrew Johnson and Lyndon B. Johnson) who were
born in '08.
Both presidents were concerned with issues affecting
Black Americans and made their views strongly known
in '63.
Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation in 1862,
which took effect in 1863.
In 1963, Kennedy presented his reports to Congress on issues
related to the Civil Rights Movement, and in June of that year
delivered his Civil Rights Address on radio and television in
which he proposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Both presidents, and their successors, conferred with a nationally
known black leader about civil rights.
Both Lincoln and Andrew Johnson conferred with
Frederick Douglass.
Both Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson conferred with
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Both presidents were known for their wit and eloquence, and both
frequently quoted Shakespeare and the Bible in their speeches.
Both presidents had been captains of ships in their private lives:
Lincoln on a river boat, and Kennedy on PT-109.
Each president suffered from a genetic disease.
Lincoln had Marfan's syndrome.
Kennedy had Addison's disease.
Both presidents were shot in the head on a Friday seated beside
their wives.
Both Fridays preceded a major holiday observed within the week.
During the assassination, they were sitting in an alphabetical
pattern.
Their spouses first name and both president's last name.
J,K,L,M- Jackie, Kennedy, Lincoln, Mary.
Jackie was seated to the left of Kennedy and Mary to
the right of Lincoln.
Both presidents were accompanied by another couple.
The male companion of the other couple was wounded
by the assassin.
Both presidents fathered four children, and had a son
die during his presidency.
Both presidents had only one child survive into the next century.
That child served another president by political appointment.
Both presidents' wives died in their sixties after an untimely decline
in health, during the administration of a president who had seen
their husbands in Washington, D.C. the same year as the
assassination (Mary Todd Lincoln died during the presidency of
Chester A. Arthur. Arthur had attended President Lincoln's 1865
inauguration.
Jacqueline Kennedy died during the presidency of Bill Clinton.
Clinton met President Kennedy in 1963 during a Boys State
summer program).
Lincoln was shot by John Wilkes Booth at Ford's Theatre.
Kennedy was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald in a Lincoln automobile,
made by Ford.
Both presidents' last names have 7 letters.
Both assassins' full names have 15 letters.
Each assassin committed his crime in the building where he
was employed.
Both presidents were purportedly smiling immediately before
the assassination began.
After shooting Lincoln, Booth ran from a theatre to a warehouse;
after shooting Kennedy, Oswald ran from a warehouse to a theatre.
Both assassins died in the same month as their victim in a state
adjacent to the state of their birth.
Both assassins were Southern white males born in the late '30s, who
were in their mid-20s, and were 5'8" in height with hazel eyes and
brown hair.
Both assassins were sympathetic to a government that opposed the
United States, and both had once resided within that government's
borders.
Both assassins were killed before being tried, by men who were
reared in the North, changed their name as adults, and were
bachelors.
Both assassins suffered injuries during escape.
Both assassins fled using modes of transportation they did not own.
Booth rented a horse, Oswald rode a bus.
Both presidents had body guards named William, William H. Crook
told Lincoln not to go to the assassination point, William Greer
drove JFK to the assassination point.
Both bodyguards named William died within 48 hours of being aged
75 years, 5 months.
Presidential security was heavily criticized,
after each assassination, for being too lax.
Lincoln sat in box number 7 at Ford's Theater.
Kennedy sat in car number 7 in the motorcade.
The doctors who primarily attended to each president were both
named Charles.
Dr. Charles Leale treated Lincoln.
Dr. Charles Crenshaw treated Kennedy.
Each president died in a place with the initials "P.H." Lincoln died
at the Petersen House and Kennedy died at Parkland Hospital.
Kennedy was the second president in U.S. history who issued
interest-free money.
The first was Lincoln, who issued greenbacks to finance the war
between the states in the American Civil War.
Friday, August 3, 2018
Death of a Nation
Death of a Nation
Can We Save America A Second Time?
By Dinesh D'Souza
August 3, 2018
Today a new Film/Documentary called, "Death of a Nation" will
be released and will be playing in Movie Theaters nationwide.
This Film/Documentary is by New York Times best selling Author,
"Dinesh D'Souza" and also by Academy Award Winning Producer,
"Gerald R. Molen" and this Film/Documentary is based on two of
Mr. D’Souza’s previous books, “The Big Lie” and, “Death of a
Nation.”
Mr. D’Souza’s previous films have largely focused and have thus far
successfully taken on the presidency of, "Barack Obama" the history
of the, "Democratic Party" and America’s role in the world.
In his latest Film/Documnetary, “Death of a Nation” Mr. D’Souza’s
directly takes President Donald Trump's critics head-on by drawing
comparisons between, "President Trump" and, "President Lincoln"
and below is a general, "Overview" of this Film/Documentary by
Mr. D’Souza’s himself:
Not since 1860 have the Democrats so fanatically refused to accept
the result of a free election.
That year, their target was Lincoln.
They smeared him.
They went to war to defeat him.
In the end, they assassinated him.
Now the target of the Democrats is President Trump and his
supporters.
The Left calls them racists, white supremacists and fascists.
These charges are used to justify driving Trump from office
and discrediting the right "by any means necessary."
But which is the party of the slave plantation?
Which is the party that invented white supremacy?
Which is the party that praised fascist dictators and shaped
their genocidal policies and was in turn praised by them?
Moreover, which is the party of racism today?
Is fascism now institutionally embodied on the right or on the left?
Through stunning historical recreations and a searching examination
of fascism and white supremacy, Death of a Nation cuts through
progressive big lies to expose hidden history and explosive truths.
Lincoln united his party and saved America from the Democrats
for the first time.
Can Trump—and we—come together and save America for the
second time?
Can We Save America A Second Time?
By Dinesh D'Souza
August 3, 2018
Today a new Film/Documentary called, "Death of a Nation" will
be released and will be playing in Movie Theaters nationwide.
This Film/Documentary is by New York Times best selling Author,
"Dinesh D'Souza" and also by Academy Award Winning Producer,
"Gerald R. Molen" and this Film/Documentary is based on two of
Mr. D’Souza’s previous books, “The Big Lie” and, “Death of a
Nation.”
Mr. D’Souza’s previous films have largely focused and have thus far
successfully taken on the presidency of, "Barack Obama" the history
of the, "Democratic Party" and America’s role in the world.
In his latest Film/Documnetary, “Death of a Nation” Mr. D’Souza’s
directly takes President Donald Trump's critics head-on by drawing
comparisons between, "President Trump" and, "President Lincoln"
and below is a general, "Overview" of this Film/Documentary by
Mr. D’Souza’s himself:
Not since 1860 have the Democrats so fanatically refused to accept
the result of a free election.
That year, their target was Lincoln.
They smeared him.
They went to war to defeat him.
In the end, they assassinated him.
Now the target of the Democrats is President Trump and his
supporters.
The Left calls them racists, white supremacists and fascists.
These charges are used to justify driving Trump from office
and discrediting the right "by any means necessary."
But which is the party of the slave plantation?
Which is the party that invented white supremacy?
Which is the party that praised fascist dictators and shaped
their genocidal policies and was in turn praised by them?
Moreover, which is the party of racism today?
Is fascism now institutionally embodied on the right or on the left?
Through stunning historical recreations and a searching examination
of fascism and white supremacy, Death of a Nation cuts through
progressive big lies to expose hidden history and explosive truths.
Lincoln united his party and saved America from the Democrats
for the first time.
Can Trump—and we—come together and save America for the
second time?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)