A Cautionary Tale
By Charles Sullivan
Information Clearing House
Thursday, May 31, 2012
Imagine entering a room in which the electrical wiring is defective.
You turn the switch on. Nothing happens. Someone replaces the
bulb but the room remains dark. The circuit breaker is deemed
operational.
Most people, after a few attempts at flipping the switch, come to
the realization that the circuit is broken. They accurately conclude
that the light is not going to come on.
This is a rational and intelligent response to the reality of the
situation; one that weds cause and effect to results.
A few of the people in the room, however, have resolute faith
in the defective circuit. They are confident that the light will
eventually come on.
Among them, the belief persists that if one continues to flip
the switch enough times, eventually it will start working.
Convinced that the problem is a defective bulb, they replace
one light bulb with another every few minutes. As with political
elections, one dim bulb follows another into the socket.
Case after case of new bulbs is exhausted. And yet, despite the
best of intentions of the optimists, the room remains as dark as
a sarcophagus.
Suffering from cognitive dissonance, the eternal optimist, like Joe
Hill’s fictitious character Mr. Block, ignores the fact that the wiring
is broken and the circuit can never be operational without a major
overhaul, regardless of how many times the switch is turned on.
They contend that changing the bulb is easier and safer than
rewiring the circuit. The optimists insist that when the right
bulb is found light will dispel darkness and everything will
become clear.
This is what they have always done. It has never worked.
Nevertheless, despite decades of contrary results, the positivity
and faith of the optimists cannot be blunted. In darkness, they
busy themselves trying the switch again and again. Ignoring the
enduring darkness, some outsiders admire the optimist’s diligence
and determination.
Light, they insist, like change one can believe in, is a matter
of faith.
Others, seeing the absurdity of these actions, scoff at the
optimist’s foolishness. Having forged a Faustian alliance
with the building’s landlords, the corporate media lauds the
optimist’s determination as a civic duty that is bound to bring
enlightenment, if only they will persist indefinitely in their
endeavor.
Both the realists and the optimists want to shine light into the
darkness; however, there is fierce disagreement about their
methodology. Like the reformer and the revolutionary, their
differences are irreconcilable.
Eventually an exulted priest, Reverend Friedman, is consulted,
who advises everyone to ignore the darkness and to obey the
proprietors of the building.
“There will be light for everyone in the afterlife,” he advises
the crowd. “One must have faith in the system and the people
it attracts to serve. Do not be deceived by the lack of results
in the present. God will see that we are not wanting when we
are dead. The free market, the divine oracle of capitalism, will
provide a solution to all of our problems.”
'The good Reverend admonishes the realists for their lack of faith
and departs for the Big Top, where barkers are attracting a crowd
and organ grinders ply their trade.
The darkened house sits on the corner of Egalitarian Avenue and
Democracy Boulevard in a town called Plutocratville. Thievery
Corporation and Fascism Incorporated, now headquartered in
Capitalist China, were once the primary businesses.
The landlords of the house, The Big “O” and Capito, propose to
keep the occupants in the dark, where they conspire to do their
work, each deflecting criticism from the other.
The landlords cynically use the optimist’s faith and their naiveté
to keep them from making the circuit function as intended by its
designers. Among historians, there is intense debate about what
their real intentions were.
Darkness prevents some of the tenants from seeing the dilapidated
condition of the house as it falls down around them.
This permits the unscrupulous landlords to continue collecting rent
while covertly looting the building of its contents, including its
copper wiring. The optimist’s preoccupation with the switch and
their unstinting faith prevents them from noticing the pilferage.
Meanwhile, the optimists have become contemptuous of the
realists, who have abandoned the switch and propose to bring
in an electrician to replace the defective wiring with a
functioning circuit.
They label the realists as doomsayers, pessimists, negativists,
and conspiracy theorists. Invoking the language of fear, the
most optimistic believers refer to the realists as socialists,
communists, or Marxists.
From the optimist’s perspective, the problem is not the broken
circuit; it is lack of faith in the system on the part of the realists.
Beset with delusion, the most extreme optimists have convinced
themselves that the light is actually shining by refusing to
acknowledge the darkness around them.
They create inspirational euphemisms that substitutes light for
dark and dark for light. Thus, hate becomes love and war, peace.
The euphoric optimists are delighted by the system; however,
they falsely perceive themselves as enlightened.
Reality and powerlessness terrifies them, so they retreat into
catacombs of fantasy. Their time-worn strategies are predicated
upon false premises.
Equipped with only vestigial eyes and terrified about the
implications of existing in utter darkness, the optimists
refuse to adopt the more revolutionary strategy of the
realists as too radical and too dangerous.
They contend that the people are not ready for directly
confronting the underlying causes of the failed circuitry.
Much like reformers during America’s era of chattel slavery, the
optimists reason that directly confronting cause and effect must
be postponed until after the November elections and the mid-terms
thereafter.
The reformers hypothesize that The Big “O” and Capito must be
reelected to a second term as landlords of the tenement, when
they will reveal their humanitarian intentions and make things
right.
To accept the darkness as the absence of light would be so
psychologically disorienting that it would cause the optimist’s
mental circuits to shut down, much like the events of 9-11 has
suspended critical thinking and scientific analysis in the USA.
Karl Marx called this state of mind false consciousness.
Although fictionalized, the Allegory of the Optimist and the Realist
raises important questions about human nature, irrational faith in
dysfunctional systems of power, and reality.
For instance, if one continually confounds false consciousness
for true consciousness and illusion for reality, how can one
make progress?
One must begin by acknowledging reality and accepting it for
what it is, regardless of how painful or undesirable its truth.
Faith does not always serve human need; it often undermines
progress and promotes oppression of the working class, despite
its occasional good intentions.
Broken systems of power do not promote justice.
Ultimately, we can only begin our respective journeys to true
consciousness and thus revolution from wherever are. But we
must have the courage to acknowledge where that is.
False hope and wishful thinking can prevent us from doing what
must be done. It can perpetuate the very inequality we are trying
to eradicate.
Reality, no matter how disturbing, provides a solid base from
which to move forward. Take it for what it is.
Charles Sullivan is a naturalist, an educator and freelance writer
residing in the Ridge and Valley Province of geopolitical West
Virginia. He does not vote or lend the appearance of legitimacy
to corrupt systems of power by participating in them.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31465.htm
Thursday, May 31, 2012
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
I Don't Remember
I Don’t Remember
By Luke Hiken
Dissident Voice
May 29th, 2012
I Don’t Remember:
Voting to wage war against every Muslim nation that is not a pawn
of U.S. capital.
Voting to support the use of unmanned drones as murder weapons
against civilian populations.
Voting to characterize corporations as “people” for purposes of
buying elections, and destroying whatever vestiges of democracy
that might have existed in the U.S.
Voting to bail out Wall Street gangsters who destroyed the U.S.
economy.
I know I did not vote to immunize these crooks from prosecution
for their theft of the wages and earnings of the American people.
Voting to destroy our educational system by indenturing students
with impossibly burdensome loans and creating annual tuitions that
only the super rich can afford.
Voting to construct the largest prison system in the world,
imprisoning African-American and Latino/Chicano prisoners
at 5 times their number in the U.S. population.
Voting to deport more than ½ million non-immigrants from this
country during Obama’s term of office alone, in spite of the fact
that nobody else will perform the services they provide to the
American people.
The cultural and social losses created by our endless detainments
and deportations are as destructive as the economic considerations
of our policies.
Voting to allow oil companies and their cohorts to reap
unimaginable profits to the detriment of the U.S. people,
while destroying the natural resources of the earth.
Voting to wage war on women’s rights to abortion, birth control,
and an equal wage for their work.
Voting to permit corporations to export our jobs overseas, while
paying no taxes on their obscene profits earned by paying slave
wages to poor people throughout the world.
Voting to immunize police departments and hired mercenaries
for their ongoing repression and violence against poor people
and minorities.
Voting to legalize torture and renditions as national policy and
practice.
Voting to allow the Pentagon to decide who is a criminal and who
is not, and to imprison anybody anywhere, without probable cause,
according to their militaristic worldview.
Voting to demand “austerity” from poor people, while allowing
the greediest monsters that have ever lived to rule this nation
and to thrive economically.
Voting to allow the pharmaceutical and insurance industries
to deprive the American people of affordable health care and
thereby impoverishing the poor and disabled.
Voting to allow Christian fanatics to demonize gay people, the
poor, and the marginalized from the benefits of our society.
Voting to allow vulture banks to steal people’s homes and
profit from their newly created homelessness.
Voting to allow 1% of the population to control more than
40% of the wealth of the nation.
BUT, I will certainly remember these things when either the
Democrats or the Republicans ask me to vote for them in
November.
Luke Hiken is an attorney who has engaged in the practice of
criminal, immigration, and appellate law.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/05/i-dont-remember/#more-44680
By Luke Hiken
Dissident Voice
May 29th, 2012
I Don’t Remember:
Voting to wage war against every Muslim nation that is not a pawn
of U.S. capital.
Voting to support the use of unmanned drones as murder weapons
against civilian populations.
Voting to characterize corporations as “people” for purposes of
buying elections, and destroying whatever vestiges of democracy
that might have existed in the U.S.
Voting to bail out Wall Street gangsters who destroyed the U.S.
economy.
I know I did not vote to immunize these crooks from prosecution
for their theft of the wages and earnings of the American people.
Voting to destroy our educational system by indenturing students
with impossibly burdensome loans and creating annual tuitions that
only the super rich can afford.
Voting to construct the largest prison system in the world,
imprisoning African-American and Latino/Chicano prisoners
at 5 times their number in the U.S. population.
Voting to deport more than ½ million non-immigrants from this
country during Obama’s term of office alone, in spite of the fact
that nobody else will perform the services they provide to the
American people.
The cultural and social losses created by our endless detainments
and deportations are as destructive as the economic considerations
of our policies.
Voting to allow oil companies and their cohorts to reap
unimaginable profits to the detriment of the U.S. people,
while destroying the natural resources of the earth.
Voting to wage war on women’s rights to abortion, birth control,
and an equal wage for their work.
Voting to permit corporations to export our jobs overseas, while
paying no taxes on their obscene profits earned by paying slave
wages to poor people throughout the world.
Voting to immunize police departments and hired mercenaries
for their ongoing repression and violence against poor people
and minorities.
Voting to legalize torture and renditions as national policy and
practice.
Voting to allow the Pentagon to decide who is a criminal and who
is not, and to imprison anybody anywhere, without probable cause,
according to their militaristic worldview.
Voting to demand “austerity” from poor people, while allowing
the greediest monsters that have ever lived to rule this nation
and to thrive economically.
Voting to allow the pharmaceutical and insurance industries
to deprive the American people of affordable health care and
thereby impoverishing the poor and disabled.
Voting to allow Christian fanatics to demonize gay people, the
poor, and the marginalized from the benefits of our society.
Voting to allow vulture banks to steal people’s homes and
profit from their newly created homelessness.
Voting to allow 1% of the population to control more than
40% of the wealth of the nation.
BUT, I will certainly remember these things when either the
Democrats or the Republicans ask me to vote for them in
November.
Luke Hiken is an attorney who has engaged in the practice of
criminal, immigration, and appellate law.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/05/i-dont-remember/#more-44680
Friday, May 25, 2012
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
No No Nato
No No Nato
By Bob Boldt
Oz House.org
May 23, 2012
Shortly after Obama won the election he spoke at a rally in
Grant Park, Chicago.
After watching the event on TV, I wrote an essay entitled,
“Chicago—the city where hope died and was reborn.”
Rereading my remarks nearly four years later, I am both proud
and ashamed.
Proud because my words were among the most eloquent and
heartfelt I have ever written, and ashamed because, I secretly
suspected Obama’s impending duplicity and betrayal.
I thought if the Liberals would only hold his feet to the fire, there
might be some chance for reform. Unfortunately this was not to be.
Liberals, flushed with victory, only wanted to sit on their hands,
happy to let their candidate lead them into the Promised Land.
I blame Liberals for these failures.
Obama might have repudiated his Wall St. buddies, the
military/industrial complex and responded in a progressive
manner had his supporters threatened revolution.
Sometimes frogs do fly and pigs grow wings.
Many Liberals still refuse to see the fascist wolf
in Liberal lambskin they voted for in ’08.
To the extent to which I was responsible for advancing this
deception, including my Chicago essay, I am deeply ashamed.
I wish I could return my vote and roll back the hours I spent
on the phone working to elect this fraud.
Last Sunday nearly fifty veterans of our brutal wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan threw away their medals in protest of the
Chicago NATO meeting.
By now the message has become amply clear;
Obama never represented “a change we can believe in,” but
only a continued suppression of our rights and a wasting of
our wealth in pursuit of a brutal American imperialism.
I was in Chicago in 1968 at the demonstrations against the
Vietnam War.
The NATO demonstrations were déjà-vu all over again with
police cracking heads with as much gusto as ’68. It is sad that
this time the press seemed more complicit with the police.
Fortunately streaming videos posted by the protesters served as
a check on the police state, their violence against and entrapment
of non-violent demonstrators.
Speaking of entrapment and spreading panic, does anyone
remember Daley’s ’68 planted rumor that demonstrators
tried to put LSD in the city’s water works?
Resistance is the last vestige of hope for change in our country.
I wish them well even though I suspect the outcome will not favor
democracy.
I also wish it were as effective to take back one’s words as it is
to repudiate violence by returning medals given to honor those actions.
Unfortunately our words ripple outwards affecting minds and
hearts forever.
Bob Boldt is a Filmmaker, Writer, Artist and retired Commercial
Film Producer.
http://ozhouse.org/2012/05/22/no-no-nato/
By Bob Boldt
Oz House.org
May 23, 2012
Shortly after Obama won the election he spoke at a rally in
Grant Park, Chicago.
After watching the event on TV, I wrote an essay entitled,
“Chicago—the city where hope died and was reborn.”
Rereading my remarks nearly four years later, I am both proud
and ashamed.
Proud because my words were among the most eloquent and
heartfelt I have ever written, and ashamed because, I secretly
suspected Obama’s impending duplicity and betrayal.
I thought if the Liberals would only hold his feet to the fire, there
might be some chance for reform. Unfortunately this was not to be.
Liberals, flushed with victory, only wanted to sit on their hands,
happy to let their candidate lead them into the Promised Land.
I blame Liberals for these failures.
Obama might have repudiated his Wall St. buddies, the
military/industrial complex and responded in a progressive
manner had his supporters threatened revolution.
Sometimes frogs do fly and pigs grow wings.
Many Liberals still refuse to see the fascist wolf
in Liberal lambskin they voted for in ’08.
To the extent to which I was responsible for advancing this
deception, including my Chicago essay, I am deeply ashamed.
I wish I could return my vote and roll back the hours I spent
on the phone working to elect this fraud.
Last Sunday nearly fifty veterans of our brutal wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan threw away their medals in protest of the
Chicago NATO meeting.
By now the message has become amply clear;
Obama never represented “a change we can believe in,” but
only a continued suppression of our rights and a wasting of
our wealth in pursuit of a brutal American imperialism.
I was in Chicago in 1968 at the demonstrations against the
Vietnam War.
The NATO demonstrations were déjà-vu all over again with
police cracking heads with as much gusto as ’68. It is sad that
this time the press seemed more complicit with the police.
Fortunately streaming videos posted by the protesters served as
a check on the police state, their violence against and entrapment
of non-violent demonstrators.
Speaking of entrapment and spreading panic, does anyone
remember Daley’s ’68 planted rumor that demonstrators
tried to put LSD in the city’s water works?
Resistance is the last vestige of hope for change in our country.
I wish them well even though I suspect the outcome will not favor
democracy.
I also wish it were as effective to take back one’s words as it is
to repudiate violence by returning medals given to honor those actions.
Unfortunately our words ripple outwards affecting minds and
hearts forever.
Bob Boldt is a Filmmaker, Writer, Artist and retired Commercial
Film Producer.
http://ozhouse.org/2012/05/22/no-no-nato/
Monday, May 21, 2012
A World Without Capitalists Is Necessary
A World Without Workers is Impossible. A World Without
Capitalists is Necessary. – World Federation of Labor
By Frank Scott
Dissident Voice
May 21st, 2012
The unemployment rate in the USA is down to just over 8%. This is
evidence that we are in a recovery from a recession. But that rate
is actually higher than it was when this particular recession began.
The patient’s temperature has gone up, a sure sign that the patient
is getting better. Huh?
Living under the rules of a profit and loss religion in a market
church controlled by private clergy, almost anything negative
can be made to sound positive, especially to those who have
not yet felt the full impact of a disintegrating political economy.
But those who are experiencing its worst aspects find no relief in
academic jargon about structural or cyclical problems, stagnation,
supply/demand curves, unemployment blips and market equilibrium.
None of this helps them find jobs or borrow enough money
to pay their rent, mortgage, food bills, or education loans.
As those people are not only in the USA but in the rest of the
world, the global nature of the problem makes it more clear that
a solution is far beyond a particular nation state and concerns
all of humanity.
An old admonition to act local but think global has come to
mean far more than was originally intended. Then it had almost
nothing to do with economics but now, if we don’t think and
act economically we may assure failure for the planet and all
its inhabitants.
That’s us, whatever market terminology may be used to hide
that fact behind national, racial, religious or other divisive
identity group labels that help keep power in minority hands.
And that minority is doing better than ever, in the short run,
amassing more power and money than any past godlike royalty
in what were supposed to have been more primitive societies.
How much has really changed since ancient times when peasants
and slaves were ground underfoot so that royal families and their
wealthy sponsors could live lives of luxury?
Not much, in essence, though the material standard of living
for workers became what was called middle class and assured
far more material comfort than previous generations of common
people enjoyed.
That lasted until the present breakdown began decreasing the
income of more people at a faster rate so that the wealth of less
people could increase at a greater rate.
What kind of system is this? This kind:
If people are murdered in wars, that is good for the weapons
business.
If illness and disease run rampant that is good for the medical
business.
If natural disaster ravages communities and kills people, that
is good for the construction industry and the burial business.
Such are the realities of the cold blooded economics by which
the people of the world have been organized for hundreds of
years.
A profit for one always means a loss for many.
The idea of keeping people healthy, safe, secure and alive is
reduced to the private force of doing so only if they are able
to create profits for those selling health, safety, security and
life itself to the highest bidder in the market.
If we can’t afford to buy those things and charity does not exist
for us, we can just drop dead.
Millions of us do, and not only in bloody wars which profit the
war makers.
Many of us starve for lack of food while others have to go on
diets because they eat so much.
Many of us sleep in doorways, on the street or under bridges,
while dogs and cats have their own rooms in comfortable homes.
None of this happens because of individuals who are thoughtless
or cold hearted or murderous, although such do exist.
But in a system which dictates that profit must be created in a
market sale, the owner of a private firm that makes band aids
can be the nicest person on earth but still only profit and prosper
if lots of people are bleeding.
The social concept of doing all that is possible to avoid bleeding
would be terrible for his private business.
That is the case for every single human endeavor in the capital
dominated religious belief system of the market, an anti-human,
anti-social core of political economics that is threatening the
future of all people all over the world.
Criticism and rebellion to such injustice is the history of humanity
but today it is growing far beyond the national minorities previously
involved in such struggle.
People organized to obey authority, work for others to survive,
live in physical poverty or shop in moral poverty and vote for
employees of wealthy rulers when allowed to and call it democracy,
have remained unorganizable for the kind of change now necessary
for the survival of humanity.
But as the critical conditions grow worse, new methods of
communication among the people are helping bring more
rebellious response to this old order of great wealth for
the few at cost of crippling poverty and debt for the many.
Under the threat of potential social collapse, environmental
destruction and radical revolution, those who reap the greatest
profits are exploiting, ravaging and murdering at insane rates
in mindless desperation to maintain their power and wealth.
That cannot continue and is no longer tolerable to billions
of human beings nor the planet’s natural support system.
All over the world of capitalist anti-social democracy, the
collapsing structure has brought about calls for austerity
from the rulers and their paid minions in government.
This means further losses absorbed by the majority so
that even greater profits can accrue to ruling minorities.
Establishment philosophers of mass culture operating through
corporate media still have enormous impact as they explain why
the present reality is all that exists and must be experienced
without substantial question.
But when increasingly painful economic conditions for more
people combine with increasingly dangerous conditions for
much of the natural environment, the complex of events called
material reality take on a new meaning well understood by
growing numbers who face that reality in all its harshness
and are less influenced by misinformation, propaganda and
economic fairy tales.
Thus, many world citizens, even while their governing powers
continue representing capital, wars and injustice, are rejecting
the ugly burdens forced on them by their rich overlords.
Elections in some places are small indications of change but far
more indicative than the voting process which is still under the
control of capital, are the rising multitudes all over the world all
aiming for the same goal: a new world based on democratic power
exercised by people taking action as members of the one and only
human race and not simply as parties, religions, sects, cults or
other labeled divisions which serve to keep minorities in control
of majority created wealth.
Those tiny minorities are the capitalists who somehow own the
fantastic wealth produced by enormous majorities of previously
divided people.
The divisions still exist and the power still is in the hands of
those minorities whose days may be numbered, but so are
those of humanity as well if action is not taken to create the
world of democratic equality which has been the stuff of wishes
and dreams but must become reality. Or else.
Doomsayers and doubters are in abundance and are to be expected,
even when they are not on the payroll of the ruling minority.
It’s easy to look at the state of the world and surrender to
present reality.
But that is only possible for those not yet suffering the ever
increasing misfortune of dependence on a political economics
of profit for a few through loss, pain and misery for most.
It is not just time for social change activists but for all citizens
of the world’s 99% to heed the words quoted at the beginning.
An end to the reign of minority capitalism is necessary to save
the earth and all its people so that we can begin a human society
offering hope for all and not just some.
Frank Scott writes political commentary which appears in print
in the Coastal Post and The Independent Monitor and online at
the blog Legalienate.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/05/a-world-without-capitalists-
is-necessary/#more-44573
Capitalists is Necessary. – World Federation of Labor
By Frank Scott
Dissident Voice
May 21st, 2012
The unemployment rate in the USA is down to just over 8%. This is
evidence that we are in a recovery from a recession. But that rate
is actually higher than it was when this particular recession began.
The patient’s temperature has gone up, a sure sign that the patient
is getting better. Huh?
Living under the rules of a profit and loss religion in a market
church controlled by private clergy, almost anything negative
can be made to sound positive, especially to those who have
not yet felt the full impact of a disintegrating political economy.
But those who are experiencing its worst aspects find no relief in
academic jargon about structural or cyclical problems, stagnation,
supply/demand curves, unemployment blips and market equilibrium.
None of this helps them find jobs or borrow enough money
to pay their rent, mortgage, food bills, or education loans.
As those people are not only in the USA but in the rest of the
world, the global nature of the problem makes it more clear that
a solution is far beyond a particular nation state and concerns
all of humanity.
An old admonition to act local but think global has come to
mean far more than was originally intended. Then it had almost
nothing to do with economics but now, if we don’t think and
act economically we may assure failure for the planet and all
its inhabitants.
That’s us, whatever market terminology may be used to hide
that fact behind national, racial, religious or other divisive
identity group labels that help keep power in minority hands.
And that minority is doing better than ever, in the short run,
amassing more power and money than any past godlike royalty
in what were supposed to have been more primitive societies.
How much has really changed since ancient times when peasants
and slaves were ground underfoot so that royal families and their
wealthy sponsors could live lives of luxury?
Not much, in essence, though the material standard of living
for workers became what was called middle class and assured
far more material comfort than previous generations of common
people enjoyed.
That lasted until the present breakdown began decreasing the
income of more people at a faster rate so that the wealth of less
people could increase at a greater rate.
What kind of system is this? This kind:
If people are murdered in wars, that is good for the weapons
business.
If illness and disease run rampant that is good for the medical
business.
If natural disaster ravages communities and kills people, that
is good for the construction industry and the burial business.
Such are the realities of the cold blooded economics by which
the people of the world have been organized for hundreds of
years.
A profit for one always means a loss for many.
The idea of keeping people healthy, safe, secure and alive is
reduced to the private force of doing so only if they are able
to create profits for those selling health, safety, security and
life itself to the highest bidder in the market.
If we can’t afford to buy those things and charity does not exist
for us, we can just drop dead.
Millions of us do, and not only in bloody wars which profit the
war makers.
Many of us starve for lack of food while others have to go on
diets because they eat so much.
Many of us sleep in doorways, on the street or under bridges,
while dogs and cats have their own rooms in comfortable homes.
None of this happens because of individuals who are thoughtless
or cold hearted or murderous, although such do exist.
But in a system which dictates that profit must be created in a
market sale, the owner of a private firm that makes band aids
can be the nicest person on earth but still only profit and prosper
if lots of people are bleeding.
The social concept of doing all that is possible to avoid bleeding
would be terrible for his private business.
That is the case for every single human endeavor in the capital
dominated religious belief system of the market, an anti-human,
anti-social core of political economics that is threatening the
future of all people all over the world.
Criticism and rebellion to such injustice is the history of humanity
but today it is growing far beyond the national minorities previously
involved in such struggle.
People organized to obey authority, work for others to survive,
live in physical poverty or shop in moral poverty and vote for
employees of wealthy rulers when allowed to and call it democracy,
have remained unorganizable for the kind of change now necessary
for the survival of humanity.
But as the critical conditions grow worse, new methods of
communication among the people are helping bring more
rebellious response to this old order of great wealth for
the few at cost of crippling poverty and debt for the many.
Under the threat of potential social collapse, environmental
destruction and radical revolution, those who reap the greatest
profits are exploiting, ravaging and murdering at insane rates
in mindless desperation to maintain their power and wealth.
That cannot continue and is no longer tolerable to billions
of human beings nor the planet’s natural support system.
All over the world of capitalist anti-social democracy, the
collapsing structure has brought about calls for austerity
from the rulers and their paid minions in government.
This means further losses absorbed by the majority so
that even greater profits can accrue to ruling minorities.
Establishment philosophers of mass culture operating through
corporate media still have enormous impact as they explain why
the present reality is all that exists and must be experienced
without substantial question.
But when increasingly painful economic conditions for more
people combine with increasingly dangerous conditions for
much of the natural environment, the complex of events called
material reality take on a new meaning well understood by
growing numbers who face that reality in all its harshness
and are less influenced by misinformation, propaganda and
economic fairy tales.
Thus, many world citizens, even while their governing powers
continue representing capital, wars and injustice, are rejecting
the ugly burdens forced on them by their rich overlords.
Elections in some places are small indications of change but far
more indicative than the voting process which is still under the
control of capital, are the rising multitudes all over the world all
aiming for the same goal: a new world based on democratic power
exercised by people taking action as members of the one and only
human race and not simply as parties, religions, sects, cults or
other labeled divisions which serve to keep minorities in control
of majority created wealth.
Those tiny minorities are the capitalists who somehow own the
fantastic wealth produced by enormous majorities of previously
divided people.
The divisions still exist and the power still is in the hands of
those minorities whose days may be numbered, but so are
those of humanity as well if action is not taken to create the
world of democratic equality which has been the stuff of wishes
and dreams but must become reality. Or else.
Doomsayers and doubters are in abundance and are to be expected,
even when they are not on the payroll of the ruling minority.
It’s easy to look at the state of the world and surrender to
present reality.
But that is only possible for those not yet suffering the ever
increasing misfortune of dependence on a political economics
of profit for a few through loss, pain and misery for most.
It is not just time for social change activists but for all citizens
of the world’s 99% to heed the words quoted at the beginning.
An end to the reign of minority capitalism is necessary to save
the earth and all its people so that we can begin a human society
offering hope for all and not just some.
Frank Scott writes political commentary which appears in print
in the Coastal Post and The Independent Monitor and online at
the blog Legalienate.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/05/a-world-without-capitalists-
is-necessary/#more-44573
Friday, May 18, 2012
Never Forget That Bradley Manning, Not Gay Marriage, Is The Issue
Never Forget That Bradley Manning, Not Gay Marriage, Is The Issue
By John Pilger
Information Clearing House
Friday, May 18, 2012
In the week Barack Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize in
2009, he ordered bombing attacks on Yemen, killing a reported
63 people, 28 of them children.
When Obama recently announced he supported same-sex marriage,
American planes had not long blown 14 Afghan civilians to bits.
In both cases, the mass murder was barely news.
What mattered were the cynical vacuities of a political celebrity,
the product of a zeitgeist driven by the forces of consumerism and
the media with the aim of diverting the struggle for social and
economic justice.
The award of the Nobel Prize to the first black president because
he "offered hope" was both absurd and an authentic expression
of the lifestyle liberalism that controls much of political debate
in the west.
Same-sex marriage is one such distraction.
No "issue" diverts attention as successfully as this: not the free
vote in Parliament on lowering the age of gay consent promoted by
the noted libertarian and war criminal Tony Blair: not the cracks in
"glass ceilings" that contribute nothing to women's liberation and
merely amplify the demands of bourgeois privilege.
Legal obstacles should not prevent people marrying each
other, regardless of gender. But this is a civil and private
matter; bourgeois acceptability is not yet a human right.
The rights historically associated with marriage are those
of property: capitalism itself.
Elevating the "right" of marriage above the right to life and real
justice is as profane as seeking allies among those who deny life
and justice to so many, from Afghanistan to Palestine.
On 9 May, hours before his Damascene declaration on same-sex
marriage, Obama sent out messages to campaign donors making
his new position clear. He asked for money.
In response, according to the Washington Post, his campaign
received a "massive surge of contributions".
The following evening, with the news now dominated by his
"conversion", he attended a fundraising party at the Los Angeles
home of the actor George Clooney.
"Hollywood," reported the Associated Press, "is home to some of
the most high-profile backers of gay marriage, and the 150 donors
who are paying $40,000 to attend Clooney's dinner will no doubt
feel invigorated by Obama's watershed announcement the day before."
The Clooney party is expected to raise a record $15 million for
Obama's re-election and will be followed by "yet another fundraiser
in New York sponsored by gay and Latino Obama supporters".
The width of a cigarette paper separates the Democratic
and Republican parties on economic and foreign policies.
Both represent the super rich and the impoverishment of a
nation from which trillions of tax dollars have been transferred
to a permanent war industry and banks that are little more
than criminal enterprises.
Obama is as reactionary and violent as George W. Bush, and in
some ways he is worse.
His personal speciality is the use of Hellfire missile-armed drones
against defenceless people.
Under cover of a partial withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, he
has sent US special forces to 120 countries where death squads are
trained.
He has revived the old cold war on two fronts: against China in Asia
and with a "shield" of missiles aimed at Russia.
The first black president has presided over the incarceration and
surveillance of greater numbers of black people than were enslaved
in 1850.
He has prosecuted more whistleblowers - truth-tellers - than any
of his predecessors.
His vice-president, Joe Biden, a zealous warmonger, has called
WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange a "hi-tech terrorist". Biden has
also converted to the cause of gay marriage.
One of America's true heroes is the gay soldier Bradley Manning,
the whistleblower alleged to have provided WikiLeaks with the
epic evidence of American carnage in Iraq and Afghanistan.
It was the Obama administration that smeared his homosexuality
as weird, and it was Obama himself who declared a man convicted
of no crime to be guilty.
Who among the fawners and luvvies at Clooney's Hollywood
moneyfest shouted, "Remember Bradley Manning"?
To my knowledge, no prominent spokesperson for gay rights
has spoken against Obama's and Biden's hypocrisy in claiming
to support same-sex marriage while terrorising a gay man
whose courage should be an inspiration to all, regardless of
sexual preference.
Obama's historic achievement as president of the United States
has been to silence the anti-war and social justice movement
associated with the Democratic Party.
Such deference to an extremism disguised by and embodied in
a clever, amoral operator, betrays the rich tradition of popular
protest in the US.
Perhaps the Occupy movement is said to be in this tradition;
perhaps not.
The truth is that what matters to those who aspire to control our
lives is not skin pigment or gender, or whether or not we are gay,
but the class we serve.
The goals are to ensure that we look inward on ourselves, not
outward to others and never comprehend the sheer scale of
undemocratic power, and to that we collaborate in isolating
those who resist.
This attrition of criminalising, brutalising and banning protest
can too easily turn western democracies into states of fear.
On 12 May, in Sydney, Australia, home of the Gay and Lesbian
Mardi Gras, a protest parade in support of gay marriage filled
the city centre. The police looked on benignly. It was a showcase
of liberalism.
Three days later, there was to be a march to commemorate
the Nakba ("The Catastrophe'), the day of mourning when
Israel expelled Palestinians from their land. A police ban
had to be overturned by the Supreme Court.
That is why the people of Greece ought to be our inspiration.
By their own painful experience they know their freedom can
only be regained by standing up to the German Central Bank,
the International Monetary Fund and their own quislings in Athens.
People across Latin America have achieved this: the indignados of
Bolivia who saw off the water privateers and the Argentinians who
told the IMF what to do with their debt.
The courage of disobedience was their weapon.
Remember Bradley Manning.
www.johnpilger.com
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31355.htm
By John Pilger
Information Clearing House
Friday, May 18, 2012
In the week Barack Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize in
2009, he ordered bombing attacks on Yemen, killing a reported
63 people, 28 of them children.
When Obama recently announced he supported same-sex marriage,
American planes had not long blown 14 Afghan civilians to bits.
In both cases, the mass murder was barely news.
What mattered were the cynical vacuities of a political celebrity,
the product of a zeitgeist driven by the forces of consumerism and
the media with the aim of diverting the struggle for social and
economic justice.
The award of the Nobel Prize to the first black president because
he "offered hope" was both absurd and an authentic expression
of the lifestyle liberalism that controls much of political debate
in the west.
Same-sex marriage is one such distraction.
No "issue" diverts attention as successfully as this: not the free
vote in Parliament on lowering the age of gay consent promoted by
the noted libertarian and war criminal Tony Blair: not the cracks in
"glass ceilings" that contribute nothing to women's liberation and
merely amplify the demands of bourgeois privilege.
Legal obstacles should not prevent people marrying each
other, regardless of gender. But this is a civil and private
matter; bourgeois acceptability is not yet a human right.
The rights historically associated with marriage are those
of property: capitalism itself.
Elevating the "right" of marriage above the right to life and real
justice is as profane as seeking allies among those who deny life
and justice to so many, from Afghanistan to Palestine.
On 9 May, hours before his Damascene declaration on same-sex
marriage, Obama sent out messages to campaign donors making
his new position clear. He asked for money.
In response, according to the Washington Post, his campaign
received a "massive surge of contributions".
The following evening, with the news now dominated by his
"conversion", he attended a fundraising party at the Los Angeles
home of the actor George Clooney.
"Hollywood," reported the Associated Press, "is home to some of
the most high-profile backers of gay marriage, and the 150 donors
who are paying $40,000 to attend Clooney's dinner will no doubt
feel invigorated by Obama's watershed announcement the day before."
The Clooney party is expected to raise a record $15 million for
Obama's re-election and will be followed by "yet another fundraiser
in New York sponsored by gay and Latino Obama supporters".
The width of a cigarette paper separates the Democratic
and Republican parties on economic and foreign policies.
Both represent the super rich and the impoverishment of a
nation from which trillions of tax dollars have been transferred
to a permanent war industry and banks that are little more
than criminal enterprises.
Obama is as reactionary and violent as George W. Bush, and in
some ways he is worse.
His personal speciality is the use of Hellfire missile-armed drones
against defenceless people.
Under cover of a partial withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, he
has sent US special forces to 120 countries where death squads are
trained.
He has revived the old cold war on two fronts: against China in Asia
and with a "shield" of missiles aimed at Russia.
The first black president has presided over the incarceration and
surveillance of greater numbers of black people than were enslaved
in 1850.
He has prosecuted more whistleblowers - truth-tellers - than any
of his predecessors.
His vice-president, Joe Biden, a zealous warmonger, has called
WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange a "hi-tech terrorist". Biden has
also converted to the cause of gay marriage.
One of America's true heroes is the gay soldier Bradley Manning,
the whistleblower alleged to have provided WikiLeaks with the
epic evidence of American carnage in Iraq and Afghanistan.
It was the Obama administration that smeared his homosexuality
as weird, and it was Obama himself who declared a man convicted
of no crime to be guilty.
Who among the fawners and luvvies at Clooney's Hollywood
moneyfest shouted, "Remember Bradley Manning"?
To my knowledge, no prominent spokesperson for gay rights
has spoken against Obama's and Biden's hypocrisy in claiming
to support same-sex marriage while terrorising a gay man
whose courage should be an inspiration to all, regardless of
sexual preference.
Obama's historic achievement as president of the United States
has been to silence the anti-war and social justice movement
associated with the Democratic Party.
Such deference to an extremism disguised by and embodied in
a clever, amoral operator, betrays the rich tradition of popular
protest in the US.
Perhaps the Occupy movement is said to be in this tradition;
perhaps not.
The truth is that what matters to those who aspire to control our
lives is not skin pigment or gender, or whether or not we are gay,
but the class we serve.
The goals are to ensure that we look inward on ourselves, not
outward to others and never comprehend the sheer scale of
undemocratic power, and to that we collaborate in isolating
those who resist.
This attrition of criminalising, brutalising and banning protest
can too easily turn western democracies into states of fear.
On 12 May, in Sydney, Australia, home of the Gay and Lesbian
Mardi Gras, a protest parade in support of gay marriage filled
the city centre. The police looked on benignly. It was a showcase
of liberalism.
Three days later, there was to be a march to commemorate
the Nakba ("The Catastrophe'), the day of mourning when
Israel expelled Palestinians from their land. A police ban
had to be overturned by the Supreme Court.
That is why the people of Greece ought to be our inspiration.
By their own painful experience they know their freedom can
only be regained by standing up to the German Central Bank,
the International Monetary Fund and their own quislings in Athens.
People across Latin America have achieved this: the indignados of
Bolivia who saw off the water privateers and the Argentinians who
told the IMF what to do with their debt.
The courage of disobedience was their weapon.
Remember Bradley Manning.
www.johnpilger.com
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31355.htm
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Idiocy as WMD
Idiocy as WMD
By Linh Dinh
Information Clearing House
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Borges writes, “dictatorships foster oppression, dictatorships foster
servitude, dictatorships foster cruelty; more abominable is the fact
that they foster idiocy.”
As a preeminent mind, Borges rightly considers the mind to be
a man’s greatest asset, for without mind, a man is nothing.
The more oppressive a political system, then, the greater its assault
on its subjects’ minds, for it’s not enough for any dictator, king or
totalitarian system to oppress and exploit, but it must, and I mean
must, make its people idiotic as well.
Every wrongful bullet is preceded and accompanied, then followed
up by a series of idiotic lies, but we’re so used to such a moronic
diet by now, our trepanned intelligentsia don’t even squirm in their
tenured chairs.
Sane men and women don’t consent to kill, rob and rape, much less
be killed, robbed and raped, least of all to enrich their masters,
and that’s why their minds must be molested as early and as much
as possible.
Hence our nonstop media brainwashing us from the cradle,
literally, to the grave.
Fixated by flickering boxes, even infants are now mind-
conditioned to become scatterbrained idiots before they
stagger into kindergarten, to begin a lifelong process
of becoming docile and slogan-shouting Democrats and
Republicans.
Yes, savages killed, but, like apes and monkeys, our ancestors,
they mostly tried to intimidate and trash talk their way out of
conflicts. There wasn’t a lot of murdering after the haka, frankly.
They didn’t wipe out entire cities by defecating exploding metal
from the sky, nor sit in a brightly lit and spic-and-span office
stroking a joy stick to ejaculate missiles half a planet away.
Drone hell fire for y’all, with sides of bank-sponsored debt slavery
and austerity, plus an unlimited refill of American pop bullshit.
Would you like a public suicide with that?
No, sir, these savages need to take webcast courses from us
sophisticates when it comes to genocide, or ecocide, or any
other kind of cides you can think of.
When it comes to pure, unadulterated savagery, these quaint brutes ain’t got shit on us plugged-in netizens chillaxin’ in that shiny upside down condo on da capital-punishment-for the-entire-world, y’all, hill.
You’d think that a government with absolute power would not
bother with expensive parades and elaborately-staged rallies in
stadia, as are routine in North Korea, but such is the importance
of propaganda and mind-control.
America has gone way beyond Kim Jong-Un and his Nuremberg-
styled pageantry, however, because the Yankee Magical Show is
relentlessly pumped into our minds via television and the internet,
at home, in office or even as we’re walking down the street, so
that we’re always swarmed by sexy sale pitches, soft and hard
porn, asinine righteousness and imbecilic trivia.
All day long, we can stuff ourselves with unlimited kitsch. Today’s
urgent topic, “Sylvester Stalone Spotted in 16th Century Painting.”
Yesterday’s, “Tom Cruise’s Daughter Gets Inked.”
Imagine a triple-amputee Iraq vet or an unemployed mother,
sitting in an about to be foreclosed home with unpaid bills
scattered across her kitchen table, staring at such headlines.
At 48, I’m old enough to remember when it wasn’t this
overwhelmingly stupid, though the dumbing down of
America will only accelerate as this cornered and bankrupt
country becomes ever more vicious to its citizens and
foreigners alike.
Not content to kill and loot, America must do it to pulsating music;
cool, orgasmic dancing; raunchy reality shows and violence-filled
Hollywood blockbusters, and these are also meant for its victims,
no less.
In a 1997 article published by the US Army War College, Ralph
Peters gushes about a “personally intrusive” and “lethal” cultural
assault as a key tactic in the American quest for global supremacy.
As information master, the American Empire will destroy its
“information victims.” What’s more, “our victims volunteer”
because they are unable to resist the seductiveness of American
culture.
Defining democracy as “that deft liberal form of imperialism,”
Peters reveals how the word is conceived and used these days
by every American leader, whether talking about Libya, Syria,
Iran or America itself.
Recognizing that the lumpens of his country are also victims of
empire, Peters frankly acknowledges that “laid-off blue-collar
worker in America and the Taliban militiaman in Afghanistan
are brothers in suffering.”
Much has been made of the internet as enabling democracy and
protest, but whatever utility it may have for the disenfranchised
and/or rebellious, the Web is most useful to our rulers.
As Dmitry Orlov points out in a recent blog, the internet is a
powerful surveillance tool for the state and, what’s more, it
also keeps the masses distracted and pacified.
Echoing Queen Victoria’s remark, “Give my people plenty of
beer, good and cheap beer, and you will have no revolution
among them,” Orlov observes that virtual sex thwarts rebellion.
In sum, while the internet may empower some people, as in
allowing John Michael Greer, Paul Craig Roberts or Orlov to
publish their unflinching commentaries, the same internet
also drowns them out with an unprecedented flood of drivel.
Defending the empire, Ralph Peters cheerfully agrees,
“The internet is to the techno-capable disaffected what the
United Nations is to marginal states: it offers the illusion of
empowerment and community.”
Though our only hope is to be expelled from this sick matrix,
many of us will cling even more fiercely to these illusions of
knowledge, love, sex and community as we blunder forward.
A breathing and tactile life will become even more alien, I’m
afraid.
Here and there, a band of unplugged weirdos, to be hunted down
and exterminated, with their demise shown on TV as warning and
entertainment.
Inhabiting a common waste land, we can each lounge in our
private electronic ghetto.
Until the juice finally runs out, that is.
Linh Dinh is tracking our deteriorating socialscape through
his frequently updated photo blog, State of the Union
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31318.htm
By Linh Dinh
Information Clearing House
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Borges writes, “dictatorships foster oppression, dictatorships foster
servitude, dictatorships foster cruelty; more abominable is the fact
that they foster idiocy.”
As a preeminent mind, Borges rightly considers the mind to be
a man’s greatest asset, for without mind, a man is nothing.
The more oppressive a political system, then, the greater its assault
on its subjects’ minds, for it’s not enough for any dictator, king or
totalitarian system to oppress and exploit, but it must, and I mean
must, make its people idiotic as well.
Every wrongful bullet is preceded and accompanied, then followed
up by a series of idiotic lies, but we’re so used to such a moronic
diet by now, our trepanned intelligentsia don’t even squirm in their
tenured chairs.
Sane men and women don’t consent to kill, rob and rape, much less
be killed, robbed and raped, least of all to enrich their masters,
and that’s why their minds must be molested as early and as much
as possible.
Hence our nonstop media brainwashing us from the cradle,
literally, to the grave.
Fixated by flickering boxes, even infants are now mind-
conditioned to become scatterbrained idiots before they
stagger into kindergarten, to begin a lifelong process
of becoming docile and slogan-shouting Democrats and
Republicans.
Yes, savages killed, but, like apes and monkeys, our ancestors,
they mostly tried to intimidate and trash talk their way out of
conflicts. There wasn’t a lot of murdering after the haka, frankly.
They didn’t wipe out entire cities by defecating exploding metal
from the sky, nor sit in a brightly lit and spic-and-span office
stroking a joy stick to ejaculate missiles half a planet away.
Drone hell fire for y’all, with sides of bank-sponsored debt slavery
and austerity, plus an unlimited refill of American pop bullshit.
Would you like a public suicide with that?
No, sir, these savages need to take webcast courses from us
sophisticates when it comes to genocide, or ecocide, or any
other kind of cides you can think of.
When it comes to pure, unadulterated savagery, these quaint brutes ain’t got shit on us plugged-in netizens chillaxin’ in that shiny upside down condo on da capital-punishment-for the-entire-world, y’all, hill.
You’d think that a government with absolute power would not
bother with expensive parades and elaborately-staged rallies in
stadia, as are routine in North Korea, but such is the importance
of propaganda and mind-control.
America has gone way beyond Kim Jong-Un and his Nuremberg-
styled pageantry, however, because the Yankee Magical Show is
relentlessly pumped into our minds via television and the internet,
at home, in office or even as we’re walking down the street, so
that we’re always swarmed by sexy sale pitches, soft and hard
porn, asinine righteousness and imbecilic trivia.
All day long, we can stuff ourselves with unlimited kitsch. Today’s
urgent topic, “Sylvester Stalone Spotted in 16th Century Painting.”
Yesterday’s, “Tom Cruise’s Daughter Gets Inked.”
Imagine a triple-amputee Iraq vet or an unemployed mother,
sitting in an about to be foreclosed home with unpaid bills
scattered across her kitchen table, staring at such headlines.
At 48, I’m old enough to remember when it wasn’t this
overwhelmingly stupid, though the dumbing down of
America will only accelerate as this cornered and bankrupt
country becomes ever more vicious to its citizens and
foreigners alike.
Not content to kill and loot, America must do it to pulsating music;
cool, orgasmic dancing; raunchy reality shows and violence-filled
Hollywood blockbusters, and these are also meant for its victims,
no less.
In a 1997 article published by the US Army War College, Ralph
Peters gushes about a “personally intrusive” and “lethal” cultural
assault as a key tactic in the American quest for global supremacy.
As information master, the American Empire will destroy its
“information victims.” What’s more, “our victims volunteer”
because they are unable to resist the seductiveness of American
culture.
Defining democracy as “that deft liberal form of imperialism,”
Peters reveals how the word is conceived and used these days
by every American leader, whether talking about Libya, Syria,
Iran or America itself.
Recognizing that the lumpens of his country are also victims of
empire, Peters frankly acknowledges that “laid-off blue-collar
worker in America and the Taliban militiaman in Afghanistan
are brothers in suffering.”
Much has been made of the internet as enabling democracy and
protest, but whatever utility it may have for the disenfranchised
and/or rebellious, the Web is most useful to our rulers.
As Dmitry Orlov points out in a recent blog, the internet is a
powerful surveillance tool for the state and, what’s more, it
also keeps the masses distracted and pacified.
Echoing Queen Victoria’s remark, “Give my people plenty of
beer, good and cheap beer, and you will have no revolution
among them,” Orlov observes that virtual sex thwarts rebellion.
In sum, while the internet may empower some people, as in
allowing John Michael Greer, Paul Craig Roberts or Orlov to
publish their unflinching commentaries, the same internet
also drowns them out with an unprecedented flood of drivel.
Defending the empire, Ralph Peters cheerfully agrees,
“The internet is to the techno-capable disaffected what the
United Nations is to marginal states: it offers the illusion of
empowerment and community.”
Though our only hope is to be expelled from this sick matrix,
many of us will cling even more fiercely to these illusions of
knowledge, love, sex and community as we blunder forward.
A breathing and tactile life will become even more alien, I’m
afraid.
Here and there, a band of unplugged weirdos, to be hunted down
and exterminated, with their demise shown on TV as warning and
entertainment.
Inhabiting a common waste land, we can each lounge in our
private electronic ghetto.
Until the juice finally runs out, that is.
Linh Dinh is tracking our deteriorating socialscape through
his frequently updated photo blog, State of the Union
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31318.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
