By The Last Boy In Line
Saturday, October 31, 2020
Dear Democrats:
Sincerely,
Saturday, October 31, 2020
Dear Democrats
Dear Democrats
By The Last Boy In Line
Saturday, October 31, 2020
Dear Democrats:
Sincerely,
By The Last Boy In Line
Saturday, October 31, 2020
Dear Democrats:
Sincerely,
Thursday, October 29, 2020
Quid Pro Joe Confirmed
Quid Pro Joe Confirmed
By Steve Guest
GOP.com
October 29, 2020
Hunter Biden’s eye-opening interview is a dumpster fire for
Joe Biden.
In an admission that strikes to the heart of the corruption
enveloping Biden Inc, Hunter admitted that he would not have been
on the board of the Ukrainian natural gas company if his father was
not the Vice President.
He added, “It is impossible for me to be on any of the boards I just
mentioned without saying that I’m the son of the vice president
of the United States… I don’t think that there’s a lot of things that
would have happen in my life that if my name wasn’t Biden.”
You think?!?!?!?
Hunter was paid $50,000 a month to be on Burisma’s board while
his father was in charge of Ukraine policy.
The only marketable characteristic Hunter has is his last name
and his relation to Joe Biden.
Hunter had no experience in Ukraine or with natural gas.
But that’s not all, Hunter’s disastrous attempt to not continue to be
a distraction for his father’s campaign also revealed that Joe Biden
lied about discussing his son’s business dealings.
In the same breath, Hunter said that he and his father did not
discuss his business in Ukraine EXCEPT there was that one time.
The Bidens can’t have it both ways.
Hunter admitted that he discussed business with his father.
Joe Biden continues to lie about it.
Hunter’s interview solidified the swampy dealings that have given
Joe Biden the well-deserved name, "Quid Pro Joe."
Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian and Chinese business partners knew
what they were getting with Hunter: access and influence with
Joe Biden.
https://gop.com/quid-pro-joe-confirmed
By Steve Guest
GOP.com
October 29, 2020
Hunter Biden’s eye-opening interview is a dumpster fire for
Joe Biden.
In an admission that strikes to the heart of the corruption
enveloping Biden Inc, Hunter admitted that he would not have been
on the board of the Ukrainian natural gas company if his father was
not the Vice President.
He added, “It is impossible for me to be on any of the boards I just
mentioned without saying that I’m the son of the vice president
of the United States… I don’t think that there’s a lot of things that
would have happen in my life that if my name wasn’t Biden.”
You think?!?!?!?
Hunter was paid $50,000 a month to be on Burisma’s board while
his father was in charge of Ukraine policy.
The only marketable characteristic Hunter has is his last name
and his relation to Joe Biden.
Hunter had no experience in Ukraine or with natural gas.
But that’s not all, Hunter’s disastrous attempt to not continue to be
a distraction for his father’s campaign also revealed that Joe Biden
lied about discussing his son’s business dealings.
In the same breath, Hunter said that he and his father did not
discuss his business in Ukraine EXCEPT there was that one time.
The Bidens can’t have it both ways.
Hunter admitted that he discussed business with his father.
Joe Biden continues to lie about it.
Hunter’s interview solidified the swampy dealings that have given
Joe Biden the well-deserved name, "Quid Pro Joe."
Hunter Biden’s Ukrainian and Chinese business partners knew
what they were getting with Hunter: access and influence with
Joe Biden.
https://gop.com/quid-pro-joe-confirmed
Tuesday, October 27, 2020
Dear Deep State
Dear Deep State
By The Last Boy In Line
Tuesday, October 27, 2020
Dear Deep State:
Sincerely,
By The Last Boy In Line
Tuesday, October 27, 2020
Dear Deep State:
Sincerely,
Sunday, October 25, 2020
Satan Runs The Democrat Party
Satan Runs The Democrat Party
By Andalusia Star News
Sunday, October 25, 2020
Satan is sitting back and watching the liberals destroy the
Democratic party.
The Democrats have people who want to turn this country into
a socialist communist government.
They have about 30 people running for president who want to
have MORE give-away programs.
One woman wants to stop having cars, trucks, trains, planes –
anything that runs on fuel! I suppose she walks everywhere she
goes?
I doubt it!
Satan wants the liberals to kill more babies, even kill them
after they are born.
The liberal Democratic party can’t get enough of pushing
homosexuality and transgenders down our throats, and give
them more rights than a straight person.
Just look at what happened in the Smollett case. Special favors?!
He got by with blaming President Trump with having two men
(wearing Make America Great Again caps) beat him up. He was
proven to be a liar and got away with it Scott free.
A person writes articles in the Star-News, who hates our president
for some reason.
You probably know who she is.
I received an anonymous letter saying I don’t understand the
Democratic party.
Actually I do understand which is why I am writing this letter.
They hate all Republicans and Conservatives.
The liberals in Congress will not give up on trying to impeach
our president.
Donald Trump has been investigated by the Senate, the House of
Representatives, the CIA, the FBI, the attorney general and last,
but not least, the one and only Mueller.
Mueller and his 19 liberal lawyers could not find any collusion
or obstruction.
There is none.
It’s over.
This has been going on for three years.
They found nothing.
Let it go!
This is all the liberal democrats have done for three years; nothing
to help our country.
We have a president who has done more for the American people
in three years than any president we have ever had, Democratic
or Republican.
He has lowered the unemployment, the lowest it has ever been.
More jobs than we have people to fill them.
Stock market at its highest ever.
He passed the first tax bill in history to lower our taxes.
BUT the more he does, the more the liberals hate him.
You know, I never voted for Obama but when he got in office,
I hoped he would help our country grow.
All the terrible things he did, I don’t think anyone ever talked
of impeaching him, like the liberals are trying to do to President
Trump.
The person I said wrote an article in the Star-News said she was
tired of Donald Trump tweeting every day.
Well, look at it like this: when you have liberals calling him names
every day, he has a right to defend himself.
Oh, I forgot, only liberals can get by with calling names.
Yes, Satan is sitting back enjoying the way liberals are destroying
the country.
I don’t worry about their actions because Jesus has the last word.
https://www.andalusiastarnews.com/2019/06/05/writer-satan-
runs-democratic-party
By Andalusia Star News
Sunday, October 25, 2020
Satan is sitting back and watching the liberals destroy the
Democratic party.
The Democrats have people who want to turn this country into
a socialist communist government.
They have about 30 people running for president who want to
have MORE give-away programs.
One woman wants to stop having cars, trucks, trains, planes –
anything that runs on fuel! I suppose she walks everywhere she
goes?
I doubt it!
Satan wants the liberals to kill more babies, even kill them
after they are born.
The liberal Democratic party can’t get enough of pushing
homosexuality and transgenders down our throats, and give
them more rights than a straight person.
Just look at what happened in the Smollett case. Special favors?!
He got by with blaming President Trump with having two men
(wearing Make America Great Again caps) beat him up. He was
proven to be a liar and got away with it Scott free.
A person writes articles in the Star-News, who hates our president
for some reason.
You probably know who she is.
I received an anonymous letter saying I don’t understand the
Democratic party.
Actually I do understand which is why I am writing this letter.
They hate all Republicans and Conservatives.
The liberals in Congress will not give up on trying to impeach
our president.
Donald Trump has been investigated by the Senate, the House of
Representatives, the CIA, the FBI, the attorney general and last,
but not least, the one and only Mueller.
Mueller and his 19 liberal lawyers could not find any collusion
or obstruction.
There is none.
It’s over.
This has been going on for three years.
They found nothing.
Let it go!
This is all the liberal democrats have done for three years; nothing
to help our country.
We have a president who has done more for the American people
in three years than any president we have ever had, Democratic
or Republican.
He has lowered the unemployment, the lowest it has ever been.
More jobs than we have people to fill them.
Stock market at its highest ever.
He passed the first tax bill in history to lower our taxes.
BUT the more he does, the more the liberals hate him.
You know, I never voted for Obama but when he got in office,
I hoped he would help our country grow.
All the terrible things he did, I don’t think anyone ever talked
of impeaching him, like the liberals are trying to do to President
Trump.
The person I said wrote an article in the Star-News said she was
tired of Donald Trump tweeting every day.
Well, look at it like this: when you have liberals calling him names
every day, he has a right to defend himself.
Oh, I forgot, only liberals can get by with calling names.
Yes, Satan is sitting back enjoying the way liberals are destroying
the country.
I don’t worry about their actions because Jesus has the last word.
https://www.andalusiastarnews.com/2019/06/05/writer-satan-
runs-democratic-party
Friday, October 23, 2020
Final US Presidential Debate: 'A Win For Trump'
Final US Presidential Debate: 'A Win For Trump'
Donald Trump and Joe Biden sparred for the last time before
election day. Though both candidates had their moments,
Trump fared better with an unusually calm performance.
By Carla Bleiker
DW.com
October 23, 2020
Thursday night's debate was one of the last chances Republican
President Donald Trump and his Democratic rival, former Vice
President Joe Biden, had to appeal to large nationwide audience.
Both men seemed to be aware of how much was at stake.
Trump acted significantly more presidential than he had in recent
memory, staying calm and using familiar arguments to attack
Biden's record when it was his, Trump's, turn to speak.
And Biden, who Trump and his supporters refer to as Sleepy Joe,
was very much awake, passionately arguing against the incumbent's
policies in areas like immigration and the handling of the
coronavirus crisis.
This round of verbal sparring was quite a change of pace from the
chaos that the first debate between the two candidates had been.
"It was definitely better than the last one," J. Miles Coleman,
election analyst with the University of Virginia Center for Politics,
told DW. "Trump was more message-focused and there were no
fights with the moderator."
That marked a big difference from the last go-around.
Rule changes after the last debate During the first debate
on September 29, Trump constantly interrupted Biden, who
picked up the habit as well, though not quite as bad.
According to a tally by the Washington Post, Trump heatedly
interrupted the moderator or Biden 71 times during the first
debate, while Biden interrupted 22 times.
As a consequence, each candidate had their mic muted during
the initial two-minute answer of his opponent in each of the
six segments.
Frank Fahrenkopf, the chair of the Commission on Presidential
Debates, told the Associated Press that both the Trump and the
Biden campaign had a member backstage who monitored the person
controlling the mute button.
Trump had made it clear in advance he wasn't happy about
the rule changes.
"President Trump is committed to debating Joe Biden regardless
of last minute rule changes from the biased commission in their
latest attempt to provide advantage to their favored candidate,"
a statement from the president's reelection campaign read.
During the debate, Trump seemed to not have an issue with
moderator Kristen Welker, though — on the contrary.
"So far, I respect very much the way you're handling this," the
president told Welker at one point during the debate when she
let him respond to an argument Biden had made. Before Thursday
night, he had repeatedly attacked the NBC News correspondent.
'Learning To Die With It'
Biden started the debate out strong. The first topic of discussion
was the coronavirus and the former vice president harshly criticized
Trump for what he and his party view as a bungled response to the
pandemic.
So far, more than 220,000 people have died from COVID-19
in the US.
"Anyone who is responsible for that many deaths should not
remain president of the United States of America," Biden said.
His big moment came when Trump said Americans were "learning
to live with" the coronavirus since they had no choice.
"He says, 'We're learning to live with it.' People are learning to die
with it," Biden shot back.
Election analyst Coleman said: "That was Biden's best line."
Heated exchange over children at border
The Democratic challenger got fired up again when the discussion
turned to immigration.
He attacked the president for his policy on separating migrant
children from their parents at the border with Mexico — and was
visibly worked up over how more than 500 children are still waiting
to be reunited with their families.
"Biden is big on the sentiment that character is on the ballot
in these elections," Coleman said.
The family separation policy, which the Trump administration
stopped eventually, was criticized as unconscionable.
But the immigration segment of the debate took a turn after
a strong start for Biden.
Trump, avoiding the issue of the children still missing their parents,
pointed out that some of the detention facilities, often described
as cages, were in fact built during the Obama administration, when
Biden was vice president. "That was him. They built cages," said
Trump.
For Coleman, he said, "It would have been better if Biden had a
response."
'Trump Won'
In the end, the president came out looking somewhat stronger
than his challenger.
"Trump won, in the sense that [his debate performance] wasn't a
ebacle," said Coleman, who is also the associate editor of Sabato's
Crystal Ball, a non-partisan election campaign newsletter. "We have
set the bar so low. Now is it going to change a lot of minds? I don't
know."
For a significant number of voters, the debate came too late to
sway them, anyway: More than 42 million Americans have already
cast their ballots, a record turn-out for early voting.
https://www.dw.com/en/final-us-presidential-debate-a-win-for-trump/a-55367743
Donald Trump and Joe Biden sparred for the last time before
election day. Though both candidates had their moments,
Trump fared better with an unusually calm performance.
By Carla Bleiker
DW.com
October 23, 2020
Thursday night's debate was one of the last chances Republican
President Donald Trump and his Democratic rival, former Vice
President Joe Biden, had to appeal to large nationwide audience.
Both men seemed to be aware of how much was at stake.
Trump acted significantly more presidential than he had in recent
memory, staying calm and using familiar arguments to attack
Biden's record when it was his, Trump's, turn to speak.
And Biden, who Trump and his supporters refer to as Sleepy Joe,
was very much awake, passionately arguing against the incumbent's
policies in areas like immigration and the handling of the
coronavirus crisis.
This round of verbal sparring was quite a change of pace from the
chaos that the first debate between the two candidates had been.
"It was definitely better than the last one," J. Miles Coleman,
election analyst with the University of Virginia Center for Politics,
told DW. "Trump was more message-focused and there were no
fights with the moderator."
That marked a big difference from the last go-around.
Rule changes after the last debate During the first debate
on September 29, Trump constantly interrupted Biden, who
picked up the habit as well, though not quite as bad.
According to a tally by the Washington Post, Trump heatedly
interrupted the moderator or Biden 71 times during the first
debate, while Biden interrupted 22 times.
As a consequence, each candidate had their mic muted during
the initial two-minute answer of his opponent in each of the
six segments.
Frank Fahrenkopf, the chair of the Commission on Presidential
Debates, told the Associated Press that both the Trump and the
Biden campaign had a member backstage who monitored the person
controlling the mute button.
Trump had made it clear in advance he wasn't happy about
the rule changes.
"President Trump is committed to debating Joe Biden regardless
of last minute rule changes from the biased commission in their
latest attempt to provide advantage to their favored candidate,"
a statement from the president's reelection campaign read.
During the debate, Trump seemed to not have an issue with
moderator Kristen Welker, though — on the contrary.
"So far, I respect very much the way you're handling this," the
president told Welker at one point during the debate when she
let him respond to an argument Biden had made. Before Thursday
night, he had repeatedly attacked the NBC News correspondent.
'Learning To Die With It'
Biden started the debate out strong. The first topic of discussion
was the coronavirus and the former vice president harshly criticized
Trump for what he and his party view as a bungled response to the
pandemic.
So far, more than 220,000 people have died from COVID-19
in the US.
"Anyone who is responsible for that many deaths should not
remain president of the United States of America," Biden said.
His big moment came when Trump said Americans were "learning
to live with" the coronavirus since they had no choice.
"He says, 'We're learning to live with it.' People are learning to die
with it," Biden shot back.
Election analyst Coleman said: "That was Biden's best line."
Heated exchange over children at border
The Democratic challenger got fired up again when the discussion
turned to immigration.
He attacked the president for his policy on separating migrant
children from their parents at the border with Mexico — and was
visibly worked up over how more than 500 children are still waiting
to be reunited with their families.
"Biden is big on the sentiment that character is on the ballot
in these elections," Coleman said.
The family separation policy, which the Trump administration
stopped eventually, was criticized as unconscionable.
But the immigration segment of the debate took a turn after
a strong start for Biden.
Trump, avoiding the issue of the children still missing their parents,
pointed out that some of the detention facilities, often described
as cages, were in fact built during the Obama administration, when
Biden was vice president. "That was him. They built cages," said
Trump.
For Coleman, he said, "It would have been better if Biden had a
response."
'Trump Won'
In the end, the president came out looking somewhat stronger
than his challenger.
"Trump won, in the sense that [his debate performance] wasn't a
ebacle," said Coleman, who is also the associate editor of Sabato's
Crystal Ball, a non-partisan election campaign newsletter. "We have
set the bar so low. Now is it going to change a lot of minds? I don't
know."
For a significant number of voters, the debate came too late to
sway them, anyway: More than 42 million Americans have already
cast their ballots, a record turn-out for early voting.
https://www.dw.com/en/final-us-presidential-debate-a-win-for-trump/a-55367743
Sunday, October 18, 2020
Dear Democrats
Dear Democrats
By The Last Boy In Line
Sunday, October 18, 2020
Dear Democrats:
Sincerely,
By The Last Boy In Line
Sunday, October 18, 2020
Dear Democrats:
Sincerely,
Friday, October 16, 2020
Hunter Biden's Troubled Life
Hunter Biden's Troubled Life
Hunter Biden's Forgotten Laptop Mirrors Troubled Life
By Rowan Scarborough
The Washington Times
October 16, 2020
At the time Hunter Biden’s laptop reportedly sat unclaimed at a
Delaware repair shop, the son of Democratic presidential candidate
Joseph R. Biden was living a tumultuous life, including facing a
paternity lawsuit from an exotic dancer.
The repair shop owner, John Paul Mac Isaac, told The New York
Post a man who he cannot identify left the MacBook Pro in April
2019.
He never returned, and Mr. Isaac eventually took custody.
He gave a download of the contents to the FBI and President
Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, who provided
the data to the Post.
The chain of events raises the question of how someone —
Mr. Biden, an associate or someone else — could forget about
or knowingly discard a computer containing tens of thousands
of emails that tell tales of lucrative foreign cash transactions.
The hard drive also held explicit sex scenes involving drugs.
Robert Costello, Mr. Giuliani’s lawyer, told Fox News on Wednesday
that the hard drive contains 40,000 emails, thousands of text
messages, photographs and videos.
Hunter Biden’s attorney has not disputed that his client used
the laptop.
Hunter Biden has long been a liability for his father’s presidential
campaign.
The elder Mr. Biden has weathered criticism dating back to his
days as vice president in the Obama administration for conflict
of interest over his son’s high-flying business deals.
Hunter Biden, who has been in and out of treatment centers for
drugs and alcohol abuse, had moved to Los Angeles in 2018 to sort
of disappear, he told The New Yorker for a July 2019 profile.
In April 2019, Hunter Biden ended his much-criticized relationship
with Hallie Biden, the widow of his late brother, Beau.
In May 2019, the month after the computer was dropped off,
he married a South African woman, Melissa Cohen, six days
after they met. They were photographed in Los Angeles.
That same month, Lunden Alexis Roberts, a former exotic dancer
in a D.C. nightclub frequented by Hunter Biden, filed a paternity
lawsuit claiming Mr. Biden had fathered her child, born in August
2018.
Mr. Biden denied he ever had sex with Ms. Roberts. In November
2019, Ms. Roberts filed documents saying Mr. Biden’s DNA matched
the child’s. The case was settled in March.
In May 2019, Breitbart News broke the story that an Arizona police
report in 2016 said Hunter Biden was suspected of doing illegal
drugs in his Hertz rental.
A cocaine pipe was found in the car.
He also left behind personal items, such as two D.C. driver’s
licenses and multiple credit cards.
After the report, Hunter Biden failed to appear with other family
members at his father’s presidential campaign launch in
Philadelphia.
He resigned in April 2019 from the board of Burisma Holdings the
Ukraine natural gas company where he served with his business
partner, Devon Archer.
Burisma hired Hunter Biden after his father was named the
White House’s point man on Ukraine.
He and Mr. Archer earned millions of dollars from Burisma,
a Senate report released last month found.
Around the same time, Mr. Giuliani mounted a public campaign
to paint Hunter Biden as a lawbreaker by laundering money out
of Ukraine.
The Republican Senate report cited confidential U.S. Treasury
Department reports in suggesting that Hunter Biden violated
federal laws.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/oct/15/hunter-bidens-forgotten-laptop-mirrors-troubled-li/
Hunter Biden's Forgotten Laptop Mirrors Troubled Life
By Rowan Scarborough
The Washington Times
October 16, 2020
At the time Hunter Biden’s laptop reportedly sat unclaimed at a
Delaware repair shop, the son of Democratic presidential candidate
Joseph R. Biden was living a tumultuous life, including facing a
paternity lawsuit from an exotic dancer.
The repair shop owner, John Paul Mac Isaac, told The New York
Post a man who he cannot identify left the MacBook Pro in April
2019.
He never returned, and Mr. Isaac eventually took custody.
He gave a download of the contents to the FBI and President
Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, who provided
the data to the Post.
The chain of events raises the question of how someone —
Mr. Biden, an associate or someone else — could forget about
or knowingly discard a computer containing tens of thousands
of emails that tell tales of lucrative foreign cash transactions.
The hard drive also held explicit sex scenes involving drugs.
Robert Costello, Mr. Giuliani’s lawyer, told Fox News on Wednesday
that the hard drive contains 40,000 emails, thousands of text
messages, photographs and videos.
Hunter Biden’s attorney has not disputed that his client used
the laptop.
Hunter Biden has long been a liability for his father’s presidential
campaign.
The elder Mr. Biden has weathered criticism dating back to his
days as vice president in the Obama administration for conflict
of interest over his son’s high-flying business deals.
Hunter Biden, who has been in and out of treatment centers for
drugs and alcohol abuse, had moved to Los Angeles in 2018 to sort
of disappear, he told The New Yorker for a July 2019 profile.
In April 2019, Hunter Biden ended his much-criticized relationship
with Hallie Biden, the widow of his late brother, Beau.
In May 2019, the month after the computer was dropped off,
he married a South African woman, Melissa Cohen, six days
after they met. They were photographed in Los Angeles.
That same month, Lunden Alexis Roberts, a former exotic dancer
in a D.C. nightclub frequented by Hunter Biden, filed a paternity
lawsuit claiming Mr. Biden had fathered her child, born in August
2018.
Mr. Biden denied he ever had sex with Ms. Roberts. In November
2019, Ms. Roberts filed documents saying Mr. Biden’s DNA matched
the child’s. The case was settled in March.
In May 2019, Breitbart News broke the story that an Arizona police
report in 2016 said Hunter Biden was suspected of doing illegal
drugs in his Hertz rental.
A cocaine pipe was found in the car.
He also left behind personal items, such as two D.C. driver’s
licenses and multiple credit cards.
After the report, Hunter Biden failed to appear with other family
members at his father’s presidential campaign launch in
Philadelphia.
He resigned in April 2019 from the board of Burisma Holdings the
Ukraine natural gas company where he served with his business
partner, Devon Archer.
Burisma hired Hunter Biden after his father was named the
White House’s point man on Ukraine.
He and Mr. Archer earned millions of dollars from Burisma,
a Senate report released last month found.
Around the same time, Mr. Giuliani mounted a public campaign
to paint Hunter Biden as a lawbreaker by laundering money out
of Ukraine.
The Republican Senate report cited confidential U.S. Treasury
Department reports in suggesting that Hunter Biden violated
federal laws.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/oct/15/hunter-bidens-forgotten-laptop-mirrors-troubled-li/
Wednesday, October 14, 2020
Nancy Pelosi Lashes Out At CNN's Wolf Blitzer
Nancy Pelosi Lashes Out At CNN's Wolf Blitzer
By Joseph A. Wulfsohn
Fox News.com
October 14, 2020
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., accused CNN anchor
Wolf Blitzer Tuesday of being "an apologist ... for the Republican
position" during a stunning interview in which she grew visibly
frustrated with "The Situation Room" anchor's questions.
The fireworks began when Blitzer asked Pelosi why she "won't
accept the president's latest [coronavirus] stimulus offer."
"I hope you'll ask the same question of the Republicans on why
they don't want to meet the needs of the American people,"
Pelosi responded. "But let me say to those people because all of
my colleagues -- we represent these people ... and their needs
are not addressed in the president's proposal. So when you say
to me, 'Why don't you accept theirs?' Why don't they accept ours?"
Blitzer interjected, telling Pelosi that Americans "really need the
money now" and quoted Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., who recently
said, "People in need can't wait until February. $1.8 trillion is
significant & more than twice the Obama stimulus ... Make a deal
& put the ball in McConnell court."
"So what do you say to Ro Khanna?" Blitzer asked.
"What I say to you is I don't know why you're always an apologist
-- and many of your colleagues [are] apologists for the Republican
position," Pelosi fired back, adding "Ro Khanna, that's nice, that
sn't what we're going to do and nobody's waiting til February."
The contentious exchange continued when Blitzer pressed Pelosi
again about Trump's $1.8 trillion proposal, asking her, "why not
work out a deal with him and don't let the perfect, as they say
here in Washington, be the enemy of the good?"
"Well, I will not let the wrong be the enemy of the right," Pelosi
fired back.
"What's wrong with $1.8 trillion?" Blitzer asked.
"You know what, do you have any idea what the difference is
between the spending that they have in their bill and what we
have in our bill?" Pelosi asked before ticking off a list of her
issues with the proposal.
"That is precisely why, Madame Speaker ... it's so important right
now," Blitzer responded "Yesterday, I spoke to [former Democratic
presidential candidate] Andrew Yang, who says the same thing. It's
not everything you want but there's a lot there."
"But you know what? Honest to God!" Pelosi complained. "You
really- I cannot get over it because Andrew Yang, he's lovely.
Ro Khanna, he's lovely. They are not negotiating this situation.
They have no idea of the particulars. They have no idea of what
the language is here ..
The tension carried on until the very end, when Blitzer attempted
to wrap up the interview after the speaker accused him of
"defending the administration all this time."
"We'll leave it on the note that you're not right on this, Wolf, and
I hate to say that to you," Pelosi told the CNN anchor. "But I feel
confident about it and I feel confident about my colleagues and
I feel confident in my [committee] chairs."
Blitzer responded, "It's not about me, it's about millions
of Americans who can't put food on the table, who can't
pay the rent, and who are having trouble getting by."
"And we represent them, we represent them," Pelosi repeated
several times over Blitzer.
"As we say, don't let perfect be the enemy of the good," Blitzer
reiterated.
"It is nowhere near perfect ... we're not even close to the good,"
Pelosi shot back. "Thank you for your sensitivity to our constituents'
needs."
"I am sensitive to them because I see them on the street begging
for food, begging for money," the anchor said.
"Have you fed them?" Pelosi blurted out. "We feed them,
we feed them."
Tuesday was not the first time the speaker verbally attacked
a journalist during an interview.
In August, Pelosi lashed out at "PBS NewsHour" anchor Judy
Woodruff, accusing her of being an "advocate" for Republicans
during another heated negotiating period on coronavirus relief.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/pelosi-lashes-out-cnn-wolf-blitzer
By Joseph A. Wulfsohn
Fox News.com
October 14, 2020
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., accused CNN anchor
Wolf Blitzer Tuesday of being "an apologist ... for the Republican
position" during a stunning interview in which she grew visibly
frustrated with "The Situation Room" anchor's questions.
The fireworks began when Blitzer asked Pelosi why she "won't
accept the president's latest [coronavirus] stimulus offer."
"I hope you'll ask the same question of the Republicans on why
they don't want to meet the needs of the American people,"
Pelosi responded. "But let me say to those people because all of
my colleagues -- we represent these people ... and their needs
are not addressed in the president's proposal. So when you say
to me, 'Why don't you accept theirs?' Why don't they accept ours?"
Blitzer interjected, telling Pelosi that Americans "really need the
money now" and quoted Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., who recently
said, "People in need can't wait until February. $1.8 trillion is
significant & more than twice the Obama stimulus ... Make a deal
& put the ball in McConnell court."
"So what do you say to Ro Khanna?" Blitzer asked.
"What I say to you is I don't know why you're always an apologist
-- and many of your colleagues [are] apologists for the Republican
position," Pelosi fired back, adding "Ro Khanna, that's nice, that
sn't what we're going to do and nobody's waiting til February."
The contentious exchange continued when Blitzer pressed Pelosi
again about Trump's $1.8 trillion proposal, asking her, "why not
work out a deal with him and don't let the perfect, as they say
here in Washington, be the enemy of the good?"
"Well, I will not let the wrong be the enemy of the right," Pelosi
fired back.
"What's wrong with $1.8 trillion?" Blitzer asked.
"You know what, do you have any idea what the difference is
between the spending that they have in their bill and what we
have in our bill?" Pelosi asked before ticking off a list of her
issues with the proposal.
"That is precisely why, Madame Speaker ... it's so important right
now," Blitzer responded "Yesterday, I spoke to [former Democratic
presidential candidate] Andrew Yang, who says the same thing. It's
not everything you want but there's a lot there."
"But you know what? Honest to God!" Pelosi complained. "You
really- I cannot get over it because Andrew Yang, he's lovely.
Ro Khanna, he's lovely. They are not negotiating this situation.
They have no idea of the particulars. They have no idea of what
the language is here ..
The tension carried on until the very end, when Blitzer attempted
to wrap up the interview after the speaker accused him of
"defending the administration all this time."
"We'll leave it on the note that you're not right on this, Wolf, and
I hate to say that to you," Pelosi told the CNN anchor. "But I feel
confident about it and I feel confident about my colleagues and
I feel confident in my [committee] chairs."
Blitzer responded, "It's not about me, it's about millions
of Americans who can't put food on the table, who can't
pay the rent, and who are having trouble getting by."
"And we represent them, we represent them," Pelosi repeated
several times over Blitzer.
"As we say, don't let perfect be the enemy of the good," Blitzer
reiterated.
"It is nowhere near perfect ... we're not even close to the good,"
Pelosi shot back. "Thank you for your sensitivity to our constituents'
needs."
"I am sensitive to them because I see them on the street begging
for food, begging for money," the anchor said.
"Have you fed them?" Pelosi blurted out. "We feed them,
we feed them."
Tuesday was not the first time the speaker verbally attacked
a journalist during an interview.
In August, Pelosi lashed out at "PBS NewsHour" anchor Judy
Woodruff, accusing her of being an "advocate" for Republicans
during another heated negotiating period on coronavirus relief.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/pelosi-lashes-out-cnn-wolf-blitzer
Friday, October 9, 2020
Dear Nancy Pelosi
Dear Nancy Pelosi
By The Last Boy In Line
Friday, October 9, 2020
Dear Nancy Pelosi:
Sincerely,
By The Last Boy In Line
Friday, October 9, 2020
Dear Nancy Pelosi:
Sincerely,
Thursday, October 8, 2020
Kamala Harris: Abrasive and Condescending In Vice Presidential Debate
Kamala Harris: Abrasive and Condescending In Vice Presidential Debate
By Yael Hanlon
Fox News.com
October 8, 2020
Undecided Voters found Democratic vice presidential nominee
Kamala Harris to be "abrasive and condescending" at various points
throughout Wednesday's debate with Vice President Mike Pence,
pollster Frank Luntz told the Fox News reaction panel.
"The complaint about Kamala Harris was that she was abrasive
and condescending," said Luntz, who monitored the reactions of
15 undecided voters from eight battleground states throughout
the evening.
"The complaint about Mike Pence was that he was too tired, but
[he was] vice presidential, or presidential," added Luntz, who went
on to say that "if this is a battle over style and substance -- which
is often the case with undecided voters because they simply do not
choose on policy, they also choose on persona -- this was Mike
Pence’s night."
Luntz clarified that "it’s not that Pence did so well, it’s that they
[voters] felt both candidates were not answering the questions as
well as they would have liked.
Despite this, voters seemed to appreciate that the two nominees
were significantly more cordial to each other than President Trump
and Democratic nominee Joe Biden had been in their first
presidential debate last week.
"They really did not like the ducking of questions," Luntz explained,
"but they were so much happier with this debate than they were
the first one. The first one to them was embarrassing. This one,
at least, they had the decorum. But the frustration ... was [that]
'They're ducking the question, they are pivoting.'"
Luntz said that while voters were frustrated with the vice president
for repeatedly running over his allotted time, "Harris’ reactions
to Pence -- the smiling, the smirking, the scowling" left them far
"angrier" with her performance.
"Voters do not like it when candidates run long, and when they run
long every time, they think that’s an example of being
undisciplined and unfocused," he argued.
"However, they were more agitated with Kamala's presentation than
they were with Mike Pence."
"It was clear," he concluded, "that Mike Pence was the winner of
tonight’s confrontation.""
https://www.foxnews.com/media/vice-presidential-debate-reaction-undecided-voters
By Yael Hanlon
Fox News.com
October 8, 2020
Undecided Voters found Democratic vice presidential nominee
Kamala Harris to be "abrasive and condescending" at various points
throughout Wednesday's debate with Vice President Mike Pence,
pollster Frank Luntz told the Fox News reaction panel.
"The complaint about Kamala Harris was that she was abrasive
and condescending," said Luntz, who monitored the reactions of
15 undecided voters from eight battleground states throughout
the evening.
"The complaint about Mike Pence was that he was too tired, but
[he was] vice presidential, or presidential," added Luntz, who went
on to say that "if this is a battle over style and substance -- which
is often the case with undecided voters because they simply do not
choose on policy, they also choose on persona -- this was Mike
Pence’s night."
Luntz clarified that "it’s not that Pence did so well, it’s that they
[voters] felt both candidates were not answering the questions as
well as they would have liked.
Despite this, voters seemed to appreciate that the two nominees
were significantly more cordial to each other than President Trump
and Democratic nominee Joe Biden had been in their first
presidential debate last week.
"They really did not like the ducking of questions," Luntz explained,
"but they were so much happier with this debate than they were
the first one. The first one to them was embarrassing. This one,
at least, they had the decorum. But the frustration ... was [that]
'They're ducking the question, they are pivoting.'"
Luntz said that while voters were frustrated with the vice president
for repeatedly running over his allotted time, "Harris’ reactions
to Pence -- the smiling, the smirking, the scowling" left them far
"angrier" with her performance.
"Voters do not like it when candidates run long, and when they run
long every time, they think that’s an example of being
undisciplined and unfocused," he argued.
"However, they were more agitated with Kamala's presentation than
they were with Mike Pence."
"It was clear," he concluded, "that Mike Pence was the winner of
tonight’s confrontation.""
https://www.foxnews.com/media/vice-presidential-debate-reaction-undecided-voters
Thursday, October 1, 2020
Dear Democrats
Dear Democrats
By The Last Boy In Line
Thursday, October 1, 2020
Dear Democrats:
Sincerely,
By The Last Boy In Line
Thursday, October 1, 2020
Dear Democrats:
Sincerely,